| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Templates and Modules[edit]
Top ten male singles tennis players templates[edit]
- See the subpage for the list of templates.
This is a follow-up to WT:TENNIS#"Top ten" lists and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Top ten male doubles tennis players templates and includes the top 10 ranking templates for male singles. The issues relating to these are similar to those mentioned in the earlier discussions noted. Nigej (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC).
- Delete - as with the prior list that was deleted these are difficult to maintain are are better served by having a link in the external links section to the ATP or WTA site that updates this info daily. This includes not just doubles but all singles players as well. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - the ATP does not update the information daily but weekly, on Mondays. You already deleted the doubles, for which I commented against deletion, but don’t see my comments. Why now the singles? Are these going to be replaced by an improved linked template to the ATP rankings by country of the top 10 players to be updated weekly? How is the consensus reached here to delete them as I only see two contributors, same ones as for the doubles templates, the Author Nigej and contributor Fyunck(click) that want to delete those, don’t we need a larger consensus, how come we never get notified about these decisions of deletions unless we go to a page. I don’t believe that there is no automated solution of updating those. Sashona (talk) 17:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC).
- Delete Another batch of cruft templates with no real value in keeping or having. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - some of them are regurarly updated, while the doubles templates were not. It's obvious that doubles tennis isn't getting so much attention compared to singles. While there is a date of update written on each template, it's not false information. They are not trash, same about the WTA templates. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep – I can understand some of the justification for getting rid of Doubles templates given the lack of depth in that event, but Singles has far more participants. Also, a lack of updates is not a good enough reason to simply delete. We editors have busy lives, just because we cannot devote hours and hours every week to update everything that needs to be updated, does not mean it does not belong. Furthermore, these templates do make it easier to navigate between players biographies and to learn about a wider range of players (and an encyclopedias mission is to make information more readily accessible). So unless the people in favor of deletion are going to create and maintain and alternative for this, then I say these need to be kept.MorrisIV (talk) 00:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Big 12 Conference templates[edit]
-
- Delete per WP:TCREEP, WP:CRUFT and unnecessary banner hanging. One of the main criteria for a navbox is that there's a corresponding main article directly about that topic, but the only links on these two go to the generic Big 12 Conference article. SportsGuy789 (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note that {{Footer Big 12 Conference Athlete of the Year}} and {{Big 12 Conference Athlete of the Year navbox}} are duplicates of each other anyway. SportsGuy789 (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A WP:NAVBOX is for a group of "related articles". A group of players who've won an award are not a "related group", since winning these awards are not a defining aspect of them. In reality these are being used as decorative adornments at the bottom of articles and are of no use at all for navigation. Nigej (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Mathis Gamme songs[edit]
- Template:Mathis Gamme songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
- Template:Mathis Gamme (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Red-linked template of someone who isn't notable. If this gets deleted Category:Mathis Gamme and Category:Mathis Gamme songs can be deleted as well G8. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I added a second linkless navbox. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathis Gamme. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Whatever the outcome of the AfD these two need deleting. Navboxes are specifically for navigating between articles that actually exist. Nigej (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Daet, Camarines Norte Barangay[edit]
- Template:Daet, Camarines Norte Barangay (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Unused template. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Salten Commuter Rail[edit]
- Template:Salten Commuter Rail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
No transclusions. No main article for this navbox, and the one linked article in the navbox body does not mention this rail line. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Salten Commuter Rail map[edit]
- Template:Salten Commuter Rail map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
No transclusions. Rail routemap for an article that does not exist. The one linked station does not mention this rail line. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Slovak Government approval[edit]
- Template:Slovak Government approval (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created in mid-2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:WHO LEM[edit]
- Template:WHO LEM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
- Template:WHO LEM 21 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
No transclusions, categories, or incoming links. Created in March 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- As the original author, I'm not contending this (for now). If it's important enough, I may re-add it later.
- Riventree (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
[edit]
Doc page for {{Nevada Wolf Pack football navbox}}. However that template doesn't use it, these fancy features having been removed in 2011. Nigej (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Portal-mobile[edit]
- Template:Portal-mobile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
- Template:Portal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Propose merging Template:Portal-mobile with Template:Portal.
Now that Template:Portal is visible on mobile devices, Template:Portal-mobile is a redundant template with a different style. Let's redirect uses back to Template:Portal — hike395 (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
[edit]
A template for navigating between groups of netball "convenience templates" in different years. Only used for 2006. Later games used different category structures so this approach was unsuitable. Nigej (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
2019 IPL match templates[edit]
- See the subpage for the list of templates.
Per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#2021 IPL match templates, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 10#2020 IPL match templates and other discussions noted there, these templates have been substituted into the main article and they are no longer required. Nigej (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:2009 NCAA Division I FCS independents football standings/doc[edit]
- Template:2009 NCAA Division I FCS independents football standings/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Unused doc page. Could be added to the parent but all the articles I looked at in Category:2009 NCAA Division I FCS standings templates and Category:NCAA Division I FCS football independents standings templates don't have doc pages, so seems better to delete Nigej (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:2010 MEAC football standings/doc[edit]
- Template:2010 MEAC football standings/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Doc page for {{2010 MEAC football standings}} now renamed {{2010 Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference football standings}}. However that template doesn't use it, the highlighting feature having been removed in 2010. Other years don't have doc pages. Nigej (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:2011 MEAC football standings/doc[edit]
- Template:2011 MEAC football standings/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Doc page for {{2011 MEAC football standings}} now renamed {{2011 Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference football standings}}. That template doesn't use it. Other years don't have doc pages so seems better to delete. Nigej (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:NYCS time[edit]
- Template:NYCS time (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Was TfDed here Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 4#Template:NYCS time but there wasn't a single comment. Time for another go. See {{NYCS}} which says "{{NYCS}} is a universal template intended to replace older NYCS templates such as {{NYCS time}}" and it's said that since 2007. Nigej (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)