Welcome!

BARNSTARS[edit]

• 

  The Original Barnstar Thanks for all your efforts on medical articles. Best. Doc James 10 April 2017 (UTC)

• 

  Tireless Contributor Barnstar Thank you for being a dedicated, smart, and fantastic person in the GA review. I am very impressed with your knowledge and dedication. I hope we can work together in the future. AmericanAir88 12 Novembehank)

• 

  The Original Barnstar Congratulations on getting Vitamin C to GA status through a fair bit of turbulence! Chiswick Chap 27 November 2017 (UTC)

• 

  Barnstar of Diligence Thank you for your assistance overseeing the student edits. You help was greatly appreciated! JenOttawa 28 November 2017 (UTC)

• 

  Barnstar of Life You have made many, many, many significant improvements to medical content here on Wikipedia. You should have been awarded this barnstar a long time ago. The Vitamin C article is exquisite. Barbara (WVS) 7 February 2018 (UTC)

• 

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar I watched the "Averell Smith" saga unfold at the Teahouse, and wanted to thank you for your time and effort. You set a good example for others to follow... Tribe of Tiger Seconded. Deb 10 March 2018 (UTC)

• 

  The Compass BarnstarI just wanted to thank you again for all of the help that you have lent me during the process in getting Chromium to FA... UtopianPoyzin 12 October 2018 (UTC)

• 

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar Awarding you this star because you took the time and care to assist this new contributor with their first article. Your edits and participation encourage me to be a more engaged contributor. Many thanks. MBAWilbins 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• 

  The Teahouse Barnstar For being the most active editor at the Teahouse. Interstellarity (talk) 20 November 2019 (UTC)

• 

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar Thank you for your kindness and support! LorriBrown (talk) 02:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

• 

  The Copyeditor's Barnstar Thank you for all of the ref fix on Ann Walker (landowner) Kimdorris (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

• 

  The Editor's Barnstar Thank you very much! Princesse Marissa (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

• 

  Brilliant Idea Barnstar Thank you! Roccie (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• 

  The Teahouse Barnstar I know you already got this award, but I'm going to give it again since you deserve it. Benjamin Borg (Talk) 12:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

• 

  Tireless Contributor Barnstar For your edits to vitamin articles and for bringing Vitamin K to good article status, being responsive to my near endless list of things to change throughout. Well done! Tom (LT) (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

• 

  The Special Barnstar Thanks for helping me out David notMD!!! ILoveCocomelon (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

• 

  The Original Barnstar For doing really good work at the AfC Helpdesk and the Teahouse. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

• 

  The Barnstar of Diligence For all your good works at the Teahouse Celestina007 (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

• 

  The Minor Barnstar Thank you for helping me understand Wikipedia! Best Sparklestern 18 July 2021 (UTC)

My GA nomination approvals[edit]

• Egg allergy (Nov 12, 2017)
• Vitamin C (Nov 27, 2017)
• Milk allergy (Feb 15, 2018)
• Brown-tail moth (July 25, 2018)
• Luna moth (August 17, 2018)
• Red yeast rice (August 15, 2019)
• Folate (October 7, 2019)
• Vitamin B12 (April 24, 2020)
• Pantothenic acid (3 July 2020)
• Niacin (8 August 2020)
• Vitamin K (26 October 2020)
• Fish allergy (8 December 2020)
• Biotin (17 February 2021)
• Shellfish allergy (4 May 2021)
• Vitamin B6 (23 September 2021; after rejection and resubmittal)
• Riboflavin (9 December 2021; after rejection and resubmittal)
• Vitamin A working on, Dec 2021-Jan 2022

DYKs I've reviewed (keeping track of)[edit]

• West African bichir (used)
• Nemobius sylvestris (used)
• Megachile chomskyi (used)
• Robin Ling (used)
• Harold Basil Christian (used)
• General George Washington Resigning His Commission (used)
• Oriental Basin pocket gopher (used)
• Vel blood group (used)
• Alexandrea Owens (used)
• Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (used)
• Frog pond effect (used)
• Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science (used)
• Lübeck disaster (used)

And the ones I nominated[edit]

• Egg allergy for GA (used 12/5-6/17; on that day, increased daily views by 3,600. Before the DYK ~150 views/day)
• Vitamin C for GA (used 1/10-11/18; on that day, increased daily views by 2,200. Before the DYK ~3,000 views/day)
• I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold for 5X expansion (used 2/20-21/18 with image; on that day, increased daily views by 10,000. Before the DYK ~30 views/day)
• Milk allergy for GA (used 3/14-15/18; on that day increased daily views by 3,000. Before the DYK ~200 views/day)
• Brown-tail moth for GA (used 3/20-21/18; on that day increased daily views by 3,100. Before the DYK ~95 views/day)
• Luna moth for GA (used 9/12-13/18 with image; on that day increased daily views by 8,400. Before the DYK ~700 views/day)
• Vitamin deficiency for 5X DECLINED as not valid 5X expansion; March 2019
• Red yeast rice for GA (used 9/9-10/19; (submitted image not used) on that day increased daily views by 2,200. Before the DYK ~ 300 views/day)
• Folate for GA (used 10/26-27/19; on that day increased daily views by 700 (disappointing). Before the DYK ~ 1,675 views/day)
• Vitamin B12 for GA (used 5/17-18/20; on that day increased daily views by 1,300. Before the DYK ~ 2,700 views/day)
• Pantothenic acid chose to not nominate after raising to GA because there were no interesting facts.
• Niacin for GA (used 8/30-31/20; on that day increased daily views by 3,300. Before the DYK ~ 1,000 views/day)
• Vitamin K chose to not nominate after raising to GA because there were no interesting facts.
• Fish allergy for GA (used 1/4/20; (submitted image not used) on that day increased daily views by 3,600. Before the DYK ~ 20 views/day)
• Biotin for GA (used 3/4/21; on that day increased daily views by 2,000. Before the DYK ~ 1,365 views/day)
• Shellfish allergy chose to not nominate after raising to GA because there was no DYK I felt like reviewing as a quid pro quo.
• Vitamin B6 chose to not nominate after raising to GA because there were no interesting facts.
• Riboflavin For GA (used 12/28/21; on that day increased daily views by 5,500. Before the DYK ~ 610 views/day)

Top medical contributors[edit]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! (2017)[edit]

It's been fun rooting around in the dark recesses of articles on dietary supplements, nutrients, and such. David notMD (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! (2018)[edit]

The 2018 Cure Award

In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! (2019)[edit]

A new source on Cerebral Folate Deficiency[edit]

Good evening, David! I came across a new review article about Cerebral folate deficiency - in your opinion, is this review good enough to be cited/quoted in the CFD article? Review: PMID 30916789 Hope you are doing fine! Cheers from Russia, ---CopperKettle 14:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Definitely a valid ref, and provides info to improve the CFD article. David notMD (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh, great! I'm slowly reading this review and am putting some quotes from it at Talk:Cerebral folate deficiency --CopperKettle 17:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Funny[edit]

	Great Answer Badge
	Awarded to those who have given a great answer on the Teahouse Question Forum. A good answer is one that fits in with the Teahouse expectations of proper conduct: polite, patient, simple, relies on explanations not links, and leaves a talkback notification. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
I just had to dig out one of these old and unused badges and work out how it operated. I just chuckled at this reply of yours. It brightened my evening. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Minimal Niacin dose for intramuscular injection enough for a flushing[edit]

Thank you for your edits of Niacin. There was a minimal dose specified to produce flushing. However, it was not specified whether it was an oral dose or IM/IV dose. Probably the oral one. If so, we should clarify that. Do you have a good source at hand? Also, it seems that for IM/IV path, even doses as small as 10 mg are enough to produce flushing. Don't you know where can we find the source for that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim Masiutin (talk • contribs) 20:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

In a country where I live (Republic of Moldova), nicotinic acid is only available in pharmacies, as a separate substance, in injectable form only. The oral form is only available in small doses as a vitamin-B complex together with other vitamins. In Russia, situation is the same - the main form is injectable, albeit the tablets of nicotinic acid are avaialable as a serarate substance, the injectable form is more widespread. That's why I have asked to you emphasize on the form of niacin. By the way, I have substantially edited the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYP4F2 today. Could you please review it, maybe you may have some ideas on how can I improve it? Thank you very much in advance for your feedback. -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks for helping me out! i'm a newbie! Renaki1983 (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for all your help Kaleeb18 (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Tell us what you really think![edit]

Hi, David. You are the recipient of the Frankest edit summary award of the week for this. Congratulations! Bishonen | tålk 15:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC).

I got a chuckle out of that, and yes, I will keep ALL of the trophies. David notMD (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

A question from Itcouldbepossible[edit]

Please can you explain me the reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itcouldbepossible (talk • contribs) 02:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

I did not revert the SDs. Each Administrator gave a reason. I just wanted to point out to you that perhaps cease doing SD nominations until you have a better idea when to and when not to. David notMD (talk) 02:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

/Archive 4

Myles Moylan[edit]

Thank you for replying to me. I don't have an obituary but I previously submitted a piece that was published in the Tuam Herald newspaper on July 22nd, 1876 to congratulate Tuam man, Major Myles Moylan, on his 'providential escape' at the Battle of the Little Bighorn less than a month previously. His brother and nephews who were living in Tuam at the time were mentioned by name. It wasn't acceptable as proof that Myles was from Tuam. The Tuam Herald piece is attached to Myles's brother John on Myles's Findagrave page <Findagrave ></https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/169515151/john-moylan>. BuffyO'B (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Riboflavin[edit]

The article Riboflavin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Riboflavin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 22:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Riboflavin[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Riboflavin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism vs good faith edits[edit]

@David notMD Hi, I had requested for rollback permissions and you said this [1]. I want to rectify my mistakes. Could you please tell me where I could not distinguish between vandalism and good faith edits. And also could you please explain me how I can improve that? Thanks in advance. Regards Itcouldbepossible (talk) 02:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Riboflavin DYK?[edit]

Hi David and congratulations on doing most of the heavy lifting to get riboflavin to GA status.

Do you usually propose a DYK when you take articles to that point? I like to do them with my (few) new articles and since science is underrepresented at DYK, I think it would be a good idea here. As to suggestions for the hook, maybe something about it being one cause of the yellow color of urine would attract attention? Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Michael D. Turnbull I have done DYKs for most of my GAs (see my Talk page for list), and coincidently was thinking that urine color change wold draw views. I will keep you posted on progress. David notMD (talk) 15:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Help me add coi tag for AJDaGuru[edit]

You said on teahouse that I have connection to AJDaGuru I am his manager and I'm not getting paid to edit his page but I do have a conflict of interest so can you help me add that on my user page I tried several times but to no avail.Godsentme1 (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Done David notMD (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

about wikipedia page question[edit]

So my wikipedia page got deleted. I'm confused. I copied it to be just like my writer friend's page and did the same formatting and worded it along the same lines. She showcases her work/books/movies. I did the same thing with published article links to various magazines etc. Do I have to get someone else to write my page for me? I guess that's my question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diannaippolito (talk • contribs) 19:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Diannaippolito: First, you composed in the wrong place. Drafts get created as drafts (seeWP:YFA), not on User pages, and are then submitted to Articles for Creation (AfC) for review. Second, WP:BLP requires that all fact statements be properly referenced. Third - other stuff exists. Among the six million plus articles in English Wikipedia, tens of thousands merit deletion. Autobiography is frowned upon but not forbidden. See WP:AUTO. You can attempt to write about yourself, but all information must cite reliable source references. It's truth plus verification. Listing your published stuff is useful, but in Wikipedialand, DOES NOT confirm notability. What is essential is to have published articles to cite that are about you. In Wikipedialand it is even possible for a book to be article worthy but not the author. Hope this all helps. David notMD (talk) 21:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Holiday greetings (2021)[edit]

David,
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 19:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Help me asap[edit]

Hello David notMD there is a user who is using foul language towards me and being so rude the person went and removed all of the references on the article please help asap this is getting out of control you just congratulated me a few days ago now look at these people trying to destroy the article!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godsentme1 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

For the record: WP:Articles for deletion/AJDaGuru. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 01:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

I replied at the AfD, the article, and the Talk page of Godsentme1. David notMD (talk) 03:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

At first, did not realize that LBB and JC are one person. David notMD (talk) 05:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Riboflavin[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Saulo Oliveira S.[edit]

The article Saulo Oliveira S. must not be deleted as long as some wiki editors are confusing the email name of a fan (prince contact) with a possible member of the biographer's team, which is not true. There is no conflict of interest and the page is not autobiographical. About the page is orphaned, improvements will be made in the next few hours to adjust the link. It is intended to improve the page by adding even more reliable sources. Therefore the page will be improved and should not be deleted.

Please remove the page from the delete possibility. The work to build an article is arduous and this has been a personal journey of writing and learning, for someone with no connection to the artist, and it is being improved every day. Thanks for the understanding of everyone in the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princeofrockcontact (talk • contribs) 14:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Princeofrockcontact Once nominated at AfD the process must go forward. After 7-10 days an Administrator will review all the comments and reach a decision. See Help:My article got nominated for deletion!. You can add one Keep comment at the AfD, but the best path to saving the article is adding better references first, and then stating that in your AfD comment. While at AfC the draft was Declined several times because the references remained weak. Moving it to mainspace did not correct that problem. This may be an instance of WP:TOOSOON, in that Saulo has not been written about at length because his music output to date is modest. Lastly, "Prince of Rock contact" is an unusual User name choice for a person who professes to have no connection to the artist. You were asked to either confirm or deny a conflict of interest on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

thatcher Shultz[edit]

thank so much David I will try my best to fix the ref format and also I know thatcher personally I work for one of his business and he asked me to help him create a wiki non paid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deivilooney (talk • contribs) 19:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

thatcher Shultz[edit]

understood how do I do I edit my draft where do I go to edit also do u have a business number or email ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deivilooney (talk • contribs) 20:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Deivilooney As long as it is a draft, you are free to edit it directly. Only after it becomes an article are you supposed to stop doing that. I only communicate through Wikipedia Talk. P.S. Remeber to 'sign' your Talk comments by ending with typing four of ~. David notMD (talk) 20:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:katherine hoover[edit]

Thank you, for explaining my mistake on the interview. They pointed me to the official webpage to see this material. It was on her bio webpage before I emailed the family. I'll change the source to the webpage.

Thankyou, AjAirFlex (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse[edit]

I was also saying that editing while logged out can happen because the login expired, and it wasn't noticed. Cwater1 (talk) 03:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Image[edit]

A new message has been sent to you.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Karestoonegoli#Image --Karestoonegoli (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

I love coffee because people get addicted to caffeine and I'm addicted to wiki. Karestoonegoli (talk) 12:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Katherine Hoover[edit]

Hello David,

The University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music Sibley Music Library has asked to be Katherine's archives. Much of Katherine's Career predates the internet such that print copies are only available in obscure archives at this point. Still there are 4 or 5 dissertations written about Katherine's works that are available electronically from those Universitys. Is it true that dissertations and theses are generally in the public domain?

Regarding: A woman's voice : the clarinet concerti of Musgrave, Hoover, and Gotkovsky Author: Nancy King Sanders:

• It is documented by OCLC
• It has been published as a google book

You deleted an subjective statement that has been printed in several dissertations or thesis and published from interviews. The thesis documents the passive statement.

What am I doing wrong? AjAirFlex (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Creation of Wikipedia page[edit]

Hi @David notMD! Thank you for your help. As you can probably see, I am really working hard on trying to figure out the next step about being part of the Wikipedia community which is getting a page approved. So can I not use an individual's website or company's site for secondary information? I asked this in the tearoom and I thought I used it correctly in this way. I can delete all the information pertaining to him in this way, as there are enough other notable sources to carry the page. I am just wondering when it's appropriate to reference an individual's personal website or company page as secondary information because I see this done on so many pages on Wikipedia. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I really thought I had got it this time. I cut so much info out and studied Wikipedia rules! Thank you for your help. I will go into the tearoom now as well to continue to ask advice about it.MediaExpert1979 (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Logic[edit]

Thanks for pointing out the extreme leaning of Wikipedia. I don't know how a selection of opinion pieces is considered a good reference or even better, British citizens celebrating their colony being conflated with Australia day. Don't worry, I'm done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autist4lyfe (talk • contribs) 23:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Use of symbols in page names[edit]

Hello David - do you have any views on the use of symbols such as β in page names. Would you know if there is a guideline somewhere? My own feeling is that the page name ought to be readable to a general reader who may well know the term beta-carotene for example but not the symbol usage. Some pages use a symbol and others don't. Many thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 08:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Iztwoz Wikipedia: Article titles and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) suggest not using symbols, which I would take to not using non-English letters. When I enter a Greek letter in the Search Wikipedia space, I get English names. Example: μ lists M titles. David notMD (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for that. Shall go ahead and make changes. Best --Iztwoz (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Something similar just happened to Cullen328. I'll apologize profusely to you also. I have no idea what happened. I explained to him that my computer is down and I'm using a decrepit family laptop that blasts me into macros at the touch of a letter occasionally. -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Understood. David notMD (talk) 02:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Multifaceted Femme Fatale[edit]

Recent deletion problem aside, I like the edit you did to the section "Multifaceted Femme Fatale" on Jan 26. It was my first substantive edit other than plot summary work. How did you see my addition so quickly, was it on your watchlist? I've subsequently changed the title to "Complex Femme Fatale"; "multifaceted" seems like a resume key word, or something. -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

I check in as a Teahouse host several times a day, and if there has been an interaction with a new editor, I sometimes check on that person's Contributions to see what else they have been doing. For example, Arunpawargere asked a question at Teahouse which led me to find out that this editor is opposing two proposed article deletions, and is at times editing logged in to an account and not logged in - a serious error that can lead to being indefinitely blocked. So I left a note on Talk page to only edit logged in. Same editor may be paid by the companies in the articles, but has not answered to being paid or having a conflict-of-interest. Undeclared paid editing is another serious transgression. David notMD (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Were any volumes published during the perion of Le Musée Napoléon?[edit]

Yes .... this is why one of the 3 titles of the publication is Le Musee Napoleon. If the period of this title is 1804 to 1814, then much of the publication is from this period. Thanks for your interest. I've put comments on your editing at the place of your explanation on my talk -- is that how it's done? George-Amherst (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Months of effort working so long day and nights to help get the word out about a fantastic drug, HU308, destroyed without good explanation.[edit]

It would help a heck of a lot if editors had KINDLY guided me. My IQ is over 160. I hold 3 separate undergrad degrees in psychology and languages and a doctor of law. Yet I cannot understand the abrupt manner of writing of editors who say I called any of the companies MY company as if I owned it. there is no link to what they are talking about. whatever it was is gone now thanks to their assumptions that I have a conflict of interest. What I have a conflict with is editors that don't educate to explain and force educated men and women to guess what they are talking about. How would you like me to provide you legal counsel they way you guys provide me assistance? I could be abrupt and short and disparaging as well as totally speak in legalese and make assumptions you understand what I'm saying.

How on earth someone got the idea I have a conflict of interest because as a psychologist I fight alzheimers and study anything that stops inflammation of the brain. For that I and a great product under research for over 30 years are put in wikipedia hell and it is disparaged as not a notable drug. I think you all are insane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MightyMaven (talk • contribs) 14:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

MightyMaven Wikipedia has set a standard for medical/health references that prohibits content based in in vitro work, animal research and individual clinical trials. I deleted most of the content at HU-308 because the references did not qualify. At that time (Nov 2021) I stated clearly my reasons on the Talk page of the article. If there are references that meet WP:MEDRS standards, i.e., reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in journals of good reputation, then information can be added back. As a research biochemist (PhD, MIT; post-doc Sloan-Kettering), when I first started editing articles at Wikipedia I too was using references that did not meet that standard, and had a lot of my efforts reverted. David notMD (talk) 14:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)