The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
| should the colour of Template:No be the current lighter #FFC7C7 or the original darker #99? Gooduserdude (talk) 15:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Should the Growth features be given to 100% of new accounts, making them the default onboarding experience for English Wikipedia newcomers? -- MMiller (WMF) (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| We have consensus to deprecate Baidu Baike, but as of now we really don't have any consensus for another Baidu product, the Baidu Tieba. Two months ago @大猩猩城: modified Line 6 (Tianjin Metro) with frivolous mentions of Line 8 stations, and when I asked for sources supporting them to modify so, they pointed [1] to me, claimed that their members asked NDRC and provided reasons for saying Line 6 instead of Line 8.
My suggestion is to also deprecate Baidu Tieba, or even we should add it to spam blacklist due to mass user-generated contents, mass copy-paste of copyvio contents and mass release of republic of fake news. See also: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_174#Can_we_use_blogs_to_show_that_a_subject_is_discussed_in_cyberspace?. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Should a bot that adds AFC templates to drafts be made? – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Not to be confused with Marquis Who’s Who. Which of these best describes the reliability of Who’s Who (UK)   , which is currently listed as "no consensus" at RSP? (RSP entry)
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
There are reasonably frequent discussions about Amnesty:
Selfstudier (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of Behind the Voice Actors (BTVA)? They are not user-generated content and they try to distinguish themselves from websites like IMDB and it also looks like they fact-check/verify their information with the primary source with a green tick. Past discussions here look like there is no clear consensus on BTVA. After this RfC,
|
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Which format should we prefer to clarify the surname of biographical subjects with non-English names: hatnotes, explanatory notes, or something else? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Which icon should replace the currently used ones for PDF files? At #RFC: New PDF icon there was consensus to replace the current PDF icon (File:Icons-mini-file acrobat.gif  ) with one that is not based on the Adobe Acrobat logo, but not on a specific replacement. At #Further discussion (PDF icon) all the public domain icons currently available at Wikimedia Commons that are not based on the Acrobat logo were considered and three identified as clearly better than the others, this RFC seeks to determine which of those options should be used. Thryduulf (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
|
| This page has been nominated to be moved to ‘Bengaluru’ 12 times! I think that there should be a moratorium to prevent discussions from happening too frequently. For how long, I’m unsure, but other editors can suggest how long down below. Ale3353 (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Block reFill tool until fixed. -- GreenC 21:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Editors above dispute the reliability of Chinese academic publications on subjects censored by the Chinese government. Does the community think Chinese academic publications are WP:INDEPENDENT on subjects censored by the Chinese government?
|
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style