SuperHamster: "I'm proposing a new adage: the longer a response is proportional to the original post, the more ridiculous that response will be. If the response to an 80 word message is 500 words it ain't gonna be good."
Johnbod: "5 refs on a line is almost always a sure sign of trouble."
Tamzin: "The breadth of an SNG is directly proportional to the relevant topic's prevalence as a special interest among autistic people."
Abraham van Hellsing, Dracula: "We learn from failure, not from success!"
General rule of thumb: The vocabulary of an author is critical. This may seem obvious, but really study it. Does a source describe an indigenous culture as "savages"? Are violent ruffians described as boot strap-pulling adventurers? Does your source glorify violence, or romanticize a conflict or area of one? Pay attention to these things. Especially if they paint over or outright ignore well-documented fact.
Very bad sources
Thomas Goodrich (War to the Knife, Scalp Dance, etc.). Pro-Confederate bias.
J. Evetts Haley. Pro-Confederate, racist. Manifest destiny cultist.
Osprey Publishing puts out books that are beautifully illustrated, but they are general works of military history and specialize on the stuff of war. They have also previously published unreliable authors such as Gordon Williamson. Absolutely useable if the author is/authors are reliable, and superb for technical details and simple statements (i.e. "This unit was stationed over there at this time.").
Helion. See above; Helion is a less well-known Osprey.
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. My name is Vami, and I will be your reviewer. During this review I may make small edits such as spelling corrections, but I will only suggest substantive content changes in comments here. For responding to my comments, please use {{Done}}, {{Fixed}}, {{Added}}, {{Not Done}}, {{Doing}}, or {{Removed}}, followed by any comment you'd like to make. As my comments are addressed or rebutted, I will cross them out, and only my comments.<p>If I have demonstrated incompetence or caused offense, [[User talk:Vami_IV|please let me know]]. –~~~~
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Committed identity: ac5ed4745743e218e2bb034d7bc7c7260a83946617a55cf4f6e427b8918384f8f155d73bb6e7ed38f72c78c50f1ae796841c1e56109ca7f351085ec31196a0ac is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.