Regarding the WMF

Without the free labor provided by hundreds of thousands of volunteer editors, and the several hundred admin that have been selected by those editors to handle the maintenance of the English Wikipedia, there would be no need for paid employees at WMF, and in fact, the WMF would not exist. In fact, it did not exist until a great deal of work had been done by those volunteers.

What should exist between the English Wikipedia and the WMF is a partnership, with mutual respect. The community should (and does) expect that there are certain actions that must be taken using private information, but the community clearly feels actions should only be taken if it is impossible for the community to police the problem. These are rare events, but do happen. If a problem can be handled by the community, either through formal discussion or Arbitration (which is fully equipped to deal with private information and does so regularly), then we would expect that the WMF would leave matters to the community.

If WMF must take direct action, the community expects that the WMF will be exceedingly forthcoming with information, discussion and at least addressing the concerns of the community, at the same level we expect from admin and arbitrators. Without this level of accountability, there is no partnership. We accept this means that sometimes, it may mean releasing private information to Arb so they may explain the situation, even if they are not able to be a point of appeal. Arbs are fellow editors, and frankly it is more palatable to hear something without evidence from editing peers than from (WMF) accounts that only show up to give us the outcome, then disappear back to their offices, free from any consequences. Arb is our liaison to the WMF in many ways, and at the very least, they should have heard the information and been allowed the opportunity to agree or disagree with you before you took non-emergency action in this case.

We are not subjects of the WMF. We do not work for you. We are not beneath you. We owe you nothing; we are volunteers. We are trying to work WITH you to create something special, but you have to give us the same respect you demand for yourselves.

Dennis Brown

See the Open Letter from Arbcoms to the Board of Trustees below, where once again, the tone deaf WMF wants to push their views and rules on a community that is perfectly capable of taking care of itself. A Code of Conduct that is being forced on all Wikimedia projects, without consulting any of the individual Wikis. This is ruling from above, and again, treating the members of the community like peasants.

Dennis Brown

Now the Foundation (specifically T&S, the same bunch that gave us FramGate) has decided that only stewards can grant interface-admin rights at enwp, and I assume other places. [1] No consultation with the community appears to have taken place. The whittling down of control of enwp continues. They have all the money, and they now want to consolidate all the power, it would appear.

Dennis Brown

See also

• WP:CANCER
• Civility and the WMF discussion. Some animals are more equal than others.
• Open Letter from Arbcoms to the Board of Trustees

Accountability

I started editing as a registered user on Sept. 6, 2006, although I had edited unregistered some time before that. I became an administrator on April 25, 2012.

I own a non-notable company that produces ultraviolet products for a number of industries, including cannabis cultivation. I will edit in those areas since I am considered an expert in those fields. I won't edit in a way that benefits me financially.

Dennis Brown

Personal notes

Jim Liberman is a mess. Need article on his partner, Jungle Pam

List of Medknow Publications academic journals is mainly non-articles, seems problematic.

shortcuts

{{subst:AE sanction| (see template for options)}}

AE log