Meta-categories are one of the defining and distinctive features of a suicide note. Shapero (2011)
described it as features that occur at a relatively higher level of discourse. These features are not generally
realized by stereotypical words or phrases but by larger vocabularies, several sentences, or even
paragraphs. In illustrating meta-categories, Shapero (2011) provided the basic patterns for which it is
analyzed. These include who, where, why, how, events, memories, humour, instructions, and trivia. Who is
any occurrence of the note-writer explicitly saying who he or she is. Any occurrence where the note-writer
states where he or she is during the act of suicide pertains to the meta-category where. The meta-category
why refers to any text given about the note-writer’s reason(s) for his or her suicide. Meanwhile, the meta-
category how refers to the note-writer’s method of suicide. References to happenings in the past, present,
or future are events, while memories include passages of remembrance and those non-explicitly stated
recollections. On the other hand, humour refers to any attempt at humour, including jokes. Imperatives,
inventories, and statements containing clauses of command or request are called instructions. Finally, trivia
constitutes any considerable important details concerning various responsibilities of the note-writer.
Considering suicide notes as crucial evidence used in the investigation of death, forensic discourse
analysis (FDA) serves as an appropriate method of linguistic inquiry in providing an avenue in distinguishing
linguistic features of a suicide. As a specialized field of discourse analysis, FDA holds a scientific study of
linguistic evidence used for law enforcement and delivery of social justice (Kredens, 2016). It analyzes
spoken and written discourse in legal settings, such as analyzing written evidence provided in a court of
law. Also, Royce (2014) referred to the term FDA as the application of text analytic techniques to whole
texts and their constituent parts, including the analysis of style, word choice, spelling, punctuation, rhetorical
strategies, and the overall structure of written verbal, or electronic texts. The main focus of forensic
discourse analysis is to provide linguistic evidence for legal cases. With the FDA’s method to analyze and
discriminate linguistic evidence used for law enforcement and legal cases, the language embedded in the
occluded genre of suicide notes could be determined, including its structures, topics/themes, and textual
regularities and irregularities. Further, forensic discourse analysis could examine the function a suicide note
holds in a suicide act.
There have been previous studies across the globe that examined suicide notes as research focus
like that of Durkheim (1951), Shneidman and Farberow (1957), Darbonne (1969), Leenaars (1988), Black
(1993), and Linn and Lester (1996). However, most of the analyses came from psychological, psychiatric,
and sociological viewpoints centered on testing psychological views and theories of behavior and the preset
claims of behavioral categories used in suicide. Only a few studies on suicide notes have focused on the
linguistic or discursive stance like that of Osgood and Walker (1959), Gottschalk and Gleser (1960), Ogilvie,
Stone, and Shneidman (1966), Edelman and Renshaw (1982), and Gregory (1999). However, most of these
studies were conducted more than 50 years ago, and thus, this necessitates new and updated studies on
linguistic viewpoints of inquiry.
Behind the increasing interest in suicide research around the globe, research on suicide notes
remains unpopular in the Philippines which, in effect, impedes the development of studies in this area.
Moreover, there is still no clear body of literature and database of suicide notes in the archipelago. Even
though there were pioneering studies in mainland Luzon, most of these are from the perspectives of
characterizing legal texts and the plight for plain English writing. No studies have categorically explored
suicide notes as a niche for linguistic inquiry. With this, the researcher found the necessity to perpetuate a
forensic discourse-based study focusing on meta-categories in suicide notes written by Filipino note-writers
in the Philippines. Furthermore, the researcher aimed to address the scarcity of studies on suicide notes in
the present body of literature and make a theoretical insight into the field of forensic linguistics in the
Philippines.
Objective of the Study
This study aimed to uncover the distinctive features of meta-categories manifested in suicide notes
written by Filipino suicide-completers. Specifically, the study was guided by the research question ‘What
are the meta-categories found in Philippine suicide notes in terms of who, where, why, how, event, memory,
humour, instruction, and trivia?’.