Cannabis Ruderalis

How this document has been cited

—the petition alleged that the United States erected a fort on nearby land, established a battery and a fire control station there, and fired guns over petitioner's land.
- in United States v. Causby, 1946 and 42 similar citations
—holding that firing, and imminent threat of firing, of navy coastal guns over plaintiff's property imposed a servitude upon the plaintiff's land and thus amounted to a taking of some interest for public use
US Av. R. 1; 1 Avi. 315. Held that surface-owner “has a dominant right of occupancy [in airspace above his land] for purposes incident to his use and enjoyment of the surface, and there may be such a continuous and permanent use of the lower stratum which he may reasonably expect to occupy himself as to impose a servitude upon his use and enjoyment of the …
- in Basic concepts of space law and 39 similar citations
This Court has previously held that the "air rights" over an area of land are "property" for purposes the Fifth Amendment.
- in Transfer of development rights: A primer and 25 similar citations
In this regard, the Court found that "[i] f the United States, with the admitted intent to fire across the claimants' land at will should fire a single shot or put a fire control upon the land, it well might be that the taking of a right would be complete."
- in Quebedeaux v. US, 2013 and 21 similar citations
W] hile a single act may not be enough, a continuance of them in sufficient number and for a sufficient time may prove [a taking]. Every successive trespass adds to the force of the evidence
- in CAQUELIN v. US, 2018 and 25 similar citations
—bind the Government by an agreement as to matters relating to an entirely different branch of the service or within the control of his superior officers, as to which he had not authority whatever; or that an agreement into which he entered, although beyond his authority, should become binding upon the Government because it was made in the form of an express agreement …
And even if the Government physically invades only an easement in property, it must nonetheless pay compensation.
—erection and maintenance of a United States fort and a battery thereon and firing guns over petitioner's land
- in Bynum v. Onslow County, 1968 and 15 similar citations
—a later case involving the same property, the Court found that the plaintiffs had made a sufficient showing to overcome the government's demurrer.
- in Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. US, 2013 and 17 similar citations

Cited by

710 NW 2d 131 - SD: Supreme Court 2006
178 P. 3d 1240 - Colo: Court of Appeals, 5th Div. 2007
724 F. 2d 143 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit 1983
956 F. 3d 1162 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2020
Court of Federal Claims 2023
141 S. Ct. 2063 - Supreme Court 2021
Court of Federal Claims 2018
835 F. Supp. 512 - Dist. Court, ND California 1993
510 A. 2d 1101 - Md: Court of Special Appeals 1986
328 US 256 - Supreme Court 1946

Leave a Reply