Cannabis Ruderalis

How this document has been cited

—the term `wages' should be deemed to include not only the periodic monetary earnings of the employee but also the other benefits to which he [or she] is entitled as part of his [or her] compensation
- in Schachter v. CITIGROUP, INC., 2008 and 15 similar citations
—holding that a wrongfully terminated employee could recover the replacement cost of lost life insurance and medical plans
The Supreme Court explained, "[T] he evidence shows that during a portion of that time plaintiff was holding down both a full-time regular job, and a second, temporary, part-time job; that the excess earnings were brought about by the part-time work; and that the latter was work which plaintiff could also have performed while he was employed by defendant. Accordingly …
- in Roe v. State Personnel Board, 2015 and one similar citation
—the defendant in a wrongful discharge case argued that because under its collective bargaining agreement it was only required to pay an unfairly dismissed employee his lost "wages," the plaintiff should not have been provided a recovery which included the cost of replacing his fringe benefits.
- in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 2008 and 2 similar citations
—comparison between life insurance and medical plans in which discharged railroad employee participated in his subsequent employment and for which he was paying $17.70 per month at time of trial, on one hand, and medical
- in Insurance Law and Practice, with Forms and 2 similar citations
It is true that "the measure of damages for breach of contract is `the amount which will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment proximately caused thereby....'(Civ. Code, § 3300
- in Roe v. State Personnel Board, 2015 and one similar citation
The Wise court rejected a defendant employer's argument that it was entitled to an additional mitigation offset when the former employee received more from his new employment than he would have been paid by defendant
- in Roe v. State Personnel Board, 2015 and one similar citation
Even if Smith Barney paid Schachter shares of restricted stock in lieu of cash compensation (rather than using Schachter's cash compensation, when paid, to acquire the shares), those shares were not given as instruments of indebtedness of compensation; to the contrary, they were the compensation
- in Schachter v. CITIGROUP, INC., 2008 and 2 similar citations

Cited by

Cal: Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dist., 5th Div. 2015
Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dist., 1st Div. 2008
167 Cal. App. 4th 630 - Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dist., 1st Div. 2008
SA DISTRICT - 2015
Dist. Court, CD California 2024
Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2017
[CITATION] Labor and Employment in California: A Guide to Employment Laws, Regulations …
SB Eggleston… - 2019
Cal: Supreme Court 2009
218 P. 3d 262 - Cal: Supreme Court 2009

Leave a Reply