"The trial court correctly found that defendants wrongfully terminated the employment contract and that the measure of damages was the difference between the amount Silva would have received under the contract and that amount which Silva actually received from his other employment

The court held in favor of Silva, stating, "... Abell and McCoy could sell, transfer, assign, or lease the motel without restriction, but such transfer of interest did not extinguish their obligations to Silva under the contract

With this understanding we can now examine the effect of the sale of the business on these obligations of defendant.[9] No one questions, of course, defendant's "right to sell its business," but the issue is whether defendant could do so without incurring any liability for breach of its contract with plaintiff

[BOOK] Contract Doctrine, Theory and Practice

[CITATION] Entertainment Law

[CITATION] Making and Doing Deals

[CITATION] Cases and materials on equitable remedies, restitution, and damages

[CITATION] California forms of jury instruction

[CITATION] Contracts, theory and practice

[CITATION] 美国合同法