Cannabis Ruderalis

How this document has been cited

A mining claim perfected under the law, even though not vested by title deed, is property in the highest sense of that term.
- in McDermott v. City of Seattle, 1933 and 5 similar citations
—the territorial limits not then known to exist; nothing disclosed after the issue of patent can limit the effect of a patent, or except from its scope any vein or lode within its territorial limits.
However, there is no requirement in the statute to locate a lode claim over the placer claim for the purpose of including a known vein or lode in the patent application.
- in Mineral Law and 2 similar citations
Such are the rights to light and air which the owner of land may have over streets, squares, or other open places.
- in A treatise on the law of real property and 2 similar citations
Mere speculation and belief based, not on any discoveries in the placer tract or any tracings of the vein or lode adjacent thereto, but on the fact that quite a number of shafts sunk elsewhere in the district had disclosed horizontal deposits of a particular kind of ore, is not the knowledge required by this section.
Lode Claims Located Before Placer Claims RS 2333 does not apply to lodes or veins within the boundaries of a placer claim, if the lodes or veins are located under lode claims that predate the location date of the placer claims.
- in Handbook of mineral law and one similar citation
—officers of the Land Department, being merely agents of the Government, have no authority to insert in a patent under such a grant any other terms than those of conveyance, with recitals showing compliance with the conditions which the law, prescribes, and such a patent carries with it such rights to the land described as the law confers, and no other, and these rights …
- in United States Mining Statutes Annotated and 2 similar citations
If any are not thus owned, and are known to exist, the applicant for patent for a placer claim must include them in his application or he will be deemed to have declared that he had no right to them.
If the lodes or veins are owned by other claimants, this fact must also be clearly stated in the application and notices.
- in Handbook of mineral law and 2 similar citations

Cited by

432 P. 2d 435 - Ariz: Supreme Court 1967
DA Wilson - 2014
[CITATION] Mining Rights on the Public Domain. Lode and Placer Claims, Tunnels, Mill …
M RS - 2009
TS Maley - 1996
[CITATION] American Law of Mining
Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation - 1989

Leave a Reply