How this document has been cited
If anything, these standards are more specific than the criteria in other statutes authorizing summary administrative action that have been upheld against due process challenges.
- in Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 1981 and 6 similar citations
As a reviewing court, it is not our function to reevaluate the weight of the evidence or to reexamine credibility choices made by the fact finder.
- in City of Pompano Beach v. FAA, 1985 and one similar citation
Not surprisingly, these courts have uniformly concluded that such exceptions are directed to unusual, emergency, situations.
- in Air North America v. Department of Transp., 1991 and one similar citation
The Administrator is not required to give notice nor afford the pilot an opportunity to be heard prior to issuing an emergency order.
- in JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR THE FAA: AN ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARD FOR and one similar citation
NTSB must finally dispose of the appeal within sixty (60) days from the date the NTSB is notified of the emergency nature of an order.
- in AVIATION LAW: AN INTRODUCTION 3RD ED and one similar citation
The standard for review of such emergency determinations, however, is whether the Administrator's finding of an emergency was arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.
- in Medical Certification of Flight Crews: Standards and Procedures and one similar citation
However, "[i] t is not our function to reexamine credibility determinations of the Administrative Law Judge."
Cited by
[CITATION] JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR THE FAA: AN ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARD FOR
A SAFETY - AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW
DG Collins - Proceedings of the Forty-First Annual Meeting …
DD Barry… - 2005
[CITATION] Hōritsu ronsō
Meiji Daigaku. Hōritsu Kenkyūjo - 1997
28 F. 3d 210 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit 1994
[CITATION] Cases and materials on mineral law
DB Burke… - (No Title), 1994
4 F. 3d 766 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1993
959 F. 2d 1483 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1992
937 F. 2d 1427 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1991
938 F. 2d 659 - Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 1991