"It is well-settled law that the courts will not give their consideration to questions as to the constitutionality of a statute unless such consideration is necessary to the determination of a real and vital controversy between the litigants in the particular case before it. It is incumbent upon a party to an action or proceeding who assails a law invoked in the course thereof to show …

—o] ne who seeks to raise a constitutional question must show that his rights are affected injuriously by the law which he attacks and that he is actually aggrieved by its operation. "[Citation.]'[Citation

It is incumbent upon a party to an action or proceeding who assails a law invoked in the course thereof to show that the provisions of the statute thus assailed are applicable to him and that he is injuriously affected thereby

His further argument that the statute is unconstitutional because it fails to recognize exceptions of legal possession for medicinal, scientific or other proper uses, is foreclosed by the fact that he has not shown himself to be one of the class which he claims may be aggrieved

Said section contains no provision expressly requiring an intent to defraud as an essential element of the crime charged and hence is not within the constitutional exception

This contention, if sustained, would only exclude this group of employees from the benefits of the system without affecting the validity of the plan itself; and the objection could only be properly raised by those whose rights were invaded by inclusion in the system

—itself, not its application to the particular circumstances of an individual. To Supporta determination of facial unconstitutionality, Void ing the statute as a whole, petitioners cannot prevail by Sug gesting that in Some future hypothetical situation constitu tional problems may possibly arise as to the particular application of the statute, or as to particular terms of employ ment …

"The rule is well established... that one will not be heard to attack a statute on grounds that are not shown to be applicable to himself and that a court will not consider every conceivable situation which might arise under the language of the statute and will not consider the question of constitutionality with reference to hypothetical situations