Cannabis Ruderalis

How this document has been cited

We do not imply that such a provision for deviation from the drawings is to be availed of by defendant beyond reasonable limits, or in such fashion as to place upon plaintiff, of necessity, a burden of performance which may not be regarded as having been fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the parties when they entered into the contract.
This view has been taken because otherwise change provisions might be misused to "remould" contracts beyond the original intention of the contracting parties, to defeat competition in the letting of public contracts as required by statute and similar safeguarding statutes to promote official favoritism or for other reasons
A change order outside of that scope, or "cardinal change," is a breach of contract by the government.
Before the coercive effect of the threatened action can be inferred, there must be evidence of some probable consequences of it to person or property for which the remedy afforded by the courts is inadequate.
- in Contracts: Cases and materials and 2 similar citations

Cited by

73 Pa. D. & C. 506 - Pa: Court of Common Pleas 1950
53 F. Supp. 709 - Dist. Court, D. Oregon 1941
261 US 17 - Supreme Court 1923
544 P. 2d 1245 - Wash: Supreme Court 1976
422 F. 2d 242 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 1969
243 F. Supp. 302 - Dist. Court, D. South Carolina 1965
150 F. Supp. 904 - Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 1957
139 F. 2d 792 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1943
81 F. 2d 118 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 1936
271 US 43 - Supreme Court 1926

Leave a Reply