Cannabis Ruderalis

General Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sherwood

55 US 351, 14 L. Ed. 452, 1852 US LEXIS 451 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
The action was assumpsit on a time policy of insurance, subscribed by the plaintiffs in error, upon
the brig Emily, during one year from the seventeenth day of October, 1843, for the sum of eight …

RUNDLE ET AL. v. DELAWARE AND RARITAN CANAL COMPANY

55 US 80, 14 L. Ed. 335 - Supreme Court, 1852 - Google Scholar
The plaintiffs, in their declaration, show title to the property under one Adam Hoops, who had
erected his mill and built a dam in the river previous to the year 1771. In that year, the Provinces …

Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Goddard

55 US 446, 14 L. Ed. 493 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
The contract for the purchase was made with the house of Mason & Lawrence, agents of the
plaintiffs, in Boston, on the 19th September, 1850, and a memorandum of the same signed by …

Harris v. Hardeman

55 US 334, 14 L. Ed. 444 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
The defendants in error moved the Circuit Court to quash a forthcoming bond, executed by the
defendants to the plaintiff; and to set aside the judgment on which the bond was founded, upon …

Silsby v. Foote

55 US 218, 14 L. Ed. 394 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
The first exception shows the following facts: After the counsel for the plaintiff had begun his opening
address to the jury, a juror became ill, applied to the court to be discharged, and was discharged …

Webster v. Cooper

55 US 488, 14 L. Ed. 510 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
"Richard Vassall, named in the will, died about 1795, leaving only one child, Elizabeth
Vassall, who married Sir Godfrey Webster, deceased, about the first day of January, 1793, by …

Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. Corning

55 US 193, 14 L. Ed. 383 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
The appellants are a manufacturing company, incorporated by the laws of the State of New
York. They aver, that Henry Burden was the inventor of a new and useful improvement in the …

Hagan v. Walker

55 US 29, 14 L. Ed. 312 - Supreme Court, 1852 - Google Scholar
John Hagan & Co. filed their bill in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District
of Alabama, in which they state that, in the year 1834, they recovered a judgment at law in that …

GOESELE ET AL. v. BIMELER ET AL.

55 US 589, 14 L. Ed. 554, 14 S. Ct. 588 - Supreme Court, 1852 - Google Scholar
In their bill the complainants represent that they are the heirs at law of Johannes Goesele, who
died at Zoar, in the county of Tuscarawas, Ohio, in the year 1827; that the said Johannes, in his …

Peale v. Phipps

55 US 368, 14 L. Ed. 459, 12 S. Ct. 958 - Supreme Court, 1853 - Google Scholar
They state that they were the owners of two undivided third parts of a certain lot in Natchez, in
the county of Adams, in the State of Mississippi, upon which stands the City Hotel; that they were …

Leave a Reply