Page 2 of about 135 results (0.03 sec)
Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.
260 US 22, 43 S. Ct. 9, 67 L. Ed. 107 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
The plaintiff in error, the original plaintiff, owned a theatre building in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, a wall of which went to the edge of his line. Proceeding under a statute of …
Pennsylvania, a wall of which went to the edge of his line. Proceeding under a statute of …
Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.
260 US 245, 43 S. Ct. 83, 67 L. Ed. 237 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
In 1921 the Commonwealth passed the act here involved. [PL 1921, p. 479.] It provided that from
and after its passage each of ton of anthracite coal mined, "washed, screened, or otherwise prepared …
and after its passage each of ton of anthracite coal mined, "washed, screened, or otherwise prepared …
United States v. Carver
260 US 482, 43 S. Ct. 181, 67 L. Ed. 361 - Supreme Court, 1923 - Google Scholar
This is a libel in personam against the United States and the receiver of State Steamship
Corporation, a company of the State of Delaware, bankrupt, to charge the United States for supplies …
Corporation, a company of the State of Delaware, bankrupt, to charge the United States for supplies …
Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.
260 US 516, 43 S. Ct. 170, 67 L. Ed. 372 - Supreme Court, 1923 - Google Scholar
Rosenberg Bros. & Company, Inc., a New York corporation, brought this suit in the Supreme
Court of that State against Curtis Brown Company, an Oklahoma corporation. The only service …
Court of that State against Curtis Brown Company, an Oklahoma corporation. The only service …
Wichita RR & Light Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.
260 US 48, 43 S. Ct. 51, 67 L. Ed. 124 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
The appellees urge that the concession of the appellant that contracts in respect to the rates
to be charged by a public utility are subject to suspension or abrogation by the police power …
to be charged by a public utility are subject to suspension or abrogation by the police power …
General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. Co.
260 US 261, 43 S. Ct. 106, 67 L. Ed. 244 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
While the state court considered the objection to the service and overruled it before the
removal, this was not an obstacle to an examination of the question by the District Court after …
removal, this was not an obstacle to an examination of the question by the District Court after …
FTC v. Curtis Publishing Co.
260 US 568, 43 S. Ct. 210, 67 L. Ed. 408 - Supreme Court, 1923 - Google Scholar
The first section of the amended complaint declares there is reason to believe that respondent
has been and is using unfair methods of competition contrary to § 5, Act of Congress approved …
has been and is using unfair methods of competition contrary to § 5, Act of Congress approved …
Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United States
260 US 77, 43 S. Ct. 60, 67 L. Ed. 140 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit affirming
that of the District Court for Western Oklahoma. The bill in equity was filed by the United States …
that of the District Court for Western Oklahoma. The bill in equity was filed by the United States …
McKelvey v. United States
260 US 353, 43 S. Ct. 132, 67 L. Ed. 301 - Supreme Court, 1922 - Google Scholar
In August, 1919, the owners of a band of sheep then about 30 miles northwest of Mackay,
Idaho, committed to three employees the task of driving the sheep to a range on the other side …
Idaho, committed to three employees the task of driving the sheep to a range on the other side …
Mason v. United States
260 US 545, 43 S. Ct. 200, 67 L. Ed. 396 - Supreme Court, 1923 - Google Scholar
The United States, as plaintiff, brought separate suits in equity in the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana against the several groups of appellants (defendants in the …
for the Western District of Louisiana against the several groups of appellants (defendants in the …