Cannabis Ruderalis

Lucas v. Earl

281 US 111, 50 S. Ct. 241, 74 L. Ed. 731 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
This case presents the question whether the respondent, Earl, could be taxed for the whole of
the salary and attorney's fees earned by him in the years 1920 and 1921, or should be taxed …

Patton v. United States

281 US 276, 50 S. Ct. 253, 74 L. Ed. 854 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
The defendants (plaintiffs in error) were indicted in a federal district court, charged with conspiring
to bribe a federal prohibition agent, a crime punishable by imprisonment in a federal penitentiary …

Corliss v. Bowers

281 US 376, 50 S. Ct. 336, 74 L. Ed. 916 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
The question raised by the petitioner is whether the above section of the Revenue Act can be
applied constitutionally to him upon the following facts. In 1922 he transferred the fund from which …

Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship Clerks

281 US 548, 50 S. Ct. 427, 74 L. Ed. 1034 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
This suit was brought in the District Court by the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship
Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Southern Pacific Lines in Texas and …

Cochran v. Louisiana Bd. of Ed.

281 US 370, 50 S. Ct. 335, 74 L. Ed. 913 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
The appellants, as citizens and taxpayers of the State of Louisiana, brought this suit to restrain
the State Board of Education and other state officials from expending any part of the severance …

Baldwin v. Missouri

281 US 586, 50 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 1056 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
Ancillary letters of administration with the will annexed issued out of the probate court of Lewis
County, Missouri, to Harry Carstarphen, October 22, 1926. A report to that court revealed that …

Tyler v. United States

281 US 497, 50 S. Ct. 356, 74 L. Ed. 991 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
In No. 428, which arose under the act of 1916, the decedent had been a resident of
Maryland. At the time of his death, he and his wife owned as tenants by the entirety shares of …

Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Sav. Co. v. Hill

281 US 673, 50 S. Ct. 451, 74 L. Ed. 1107 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
The bill alleged that the township assessor had intentionally and systematically discriminated
against the shareholders by assessing bank stock at full value, while intentionally and systematically …

May v. Heiner

281 US 238, 50 S. Ct. 286, 74 L. Ed. 826 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
By a written instrument dated October 1st, 1917, Pauline May, wife of Barney May,
"transferred, set over and assigned" to him and others, as trustees, (with power to change the …

Gunning v. Cooley

281 US 90, 50 S. Ct. 231, 74 L. Ed. 720 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
Respondent brought this action in the supreme court of the District of Columbia to recover damages
from petitioner, 92 a practicing physician, for injuries claimed to have been caused by his negligence …

Leave a Reply