Cannabis Ruderalis

Discusses cited case at lengthIn re Technical Land, Inc.

172 BR 429 - Bankr. Court, Dist. of Columbia, 1994 - Google Scholar
… granted permission for the sale. Quoting Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US (14 How.) 52, 14
L.Ed. 322, 14 L.Ed. 322 (1852), the Court wrote: The settled rule also …

Discusses cited case at lengthIN RE DOMUN LOCIS LLC

Bankr. Court, CD California, 2014 - Google Scholar
… Id. at 455 (emphasis added), citing inter alia, California Code of Civil Procedure § 568 and Wiswall
v. Sampson, 55 US 65 (1852) … [1] In Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US 52, 14 L.Ed …

Discusses cited case at lengthIn re Domum Locis LLC

521 BR 661 - Bankr. Court, CD California, 2014 - Google Scholar
… Id. at 455, 27 P. 768 (emphasis added), citing inter alia, California Code of Civil Procedure §
568 and Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US 65, 14 How. 52, 14 L.Ed. 322 669 (1852) …

Discusses cited caseHancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman

340 NW 2d 866 - Minn: Court of Appeals, 1983 - Google Scholar
… The landmark case regarding the nature of the receivership is Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US (14
How.) 52, 14 L.Ed. 322 (1852). The Supreme Court of the United States said …

Discusses cited caseHitz v. Jenks

185 US 155, 46 L. Ed. 851, 22 S. Ct. 598 - Supreme Court, 1902 - Google Scholar
… he held possession as receiver. Let us look at some of the authorities on this general
subject. In Wiswall v. Sampson, 14 How. 52, 65, it was said: "When …

Discusses cited caseHeidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.

112 US 294, 5 S. Ct. 135, 28 L. Ed. 729 - Supreme Court, 1884 - Google Scholar
… them, was without effect. In this aspect, the case is directly within the rule of decision
303 established in Wiswall v. Sampson, 14 How. 52. That was a …

Discusses cited case brieflyProtopapas v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY CO.

94 F. 4th 351 - Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, 2024 - Google Scholar
… 447 (1872); Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US (14 How.) 52, 65-66, 14 L.Ed. 322 (1852). And he adds
that we have previously recognized that the doctrine is jurisdictional …

Discusses cited case brieflyProtopapas v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY

Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, 2024 - Google Scholar
… the property is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the receivership court for whom the receiver
acts," citing Davis v. Gray, 83 US (16 Wall.) 203, 217-19 (1872); Wiswall v. Sampson …

Discusses cited case brieflyIn re Peake

588 BR 811 - Bankr. Court, ND Illinois, 2018 - Google Scholar
… Cir. 1925); Underground Elec. Rys. Co. of London v. Owsley, 176 F. 26, 38 (2d Cir. 1909);
Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US 52, 65, 14 How. 52, 14 L.Ed. 322 …

Discusses cited case brieflyTechnical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Ins. Co.

756 A. 2d 439 - DC: Court of Appeals, 2000 - Google Scholar
… [5] The Bankruptcy Court declared that the marshal's sale was illegal and void, and passed
no title, see Wiswall v. Sampson, 55 US (14 How.) 52, 68, 14 L.Ed …

Leave a Reply