About 34 results (0.04 sec)
134 COVENTRY, LLC v. US BANK TRUST, NA
Dist. Court, SD New York, 2024 - Google Scholar
… into the breach. Kline v. Burke Const. Co., 260 US 226, 231 (1922) (quoting Baltimore
& OR Co. v. Wabash R. Co., 119 F. 678, 678 (7th Cir. 1902)); see …
& OR Co. v. Wabash R. Co., 119 F. 678, 678 (7th Cir. 1902)); see …
Sowell v. THE HUNTINGTON BANK
Dist. Court, SD Ohio, 2024 - Google Scholar
… Court. The checks should be sent to: Prisoner Accounts Receivable 260 US Courthouse
85 Marconi Boulevard Columbus, Ohio 43215 The prisoner's …
85 Marconi Boulevard Columbus, Ohio 43215 The prisoner's …
WD v. ROCKLAND COUNTY
Dist. Court, SD New York, 2024 - Google Scholar
… F. Supp. 3d 217, 257 (NDNY 2021) (quoting Zucht v. King, 260 US 174, 176 (1922)),
aff'd sub nom. Goe v. Zucker, 43 F.4th 19 (2d Cir. 2022). Here, it …
aff'd sub nom. Goe v. Zucker, 43 F.4th 19 (2d Cir. 2022). Here, it …
Stingley v. LACI TRANSPORT INC.
Dist. Court, ND Illinois, 2024 - Google Scholar
… Baltimore & OSWR Co. v. Settle, 260 US 166, 174 (1922); see also Jones v. Centurion Inv.
Assocs., Inc., 268 F. Supp. 2d 1004, 1012 (ND Ill. 2003) ("[C]rucial …
Assocs., Inc., 268 F. Supp. 2d 1004, 1012 (ND Ill. 2003) ("[C]rucial …
Marble v. NS JPF LENDER, LLC
Dist. Court, WD Oklahoma, 2024 - Google Scholar
… the United States were claiming the south bank of the river as the boundary, while Texas was
contending for the thread or middle of the stream." Oklahoma v. Texas, 260 US 606, 624 …
contending for the thread or middle of the stream." Oklahoma v. Texas, 260 US 606, 624 …
IN RE EVANS
Bankr. Court, ND Illinois, 2024 - Google Scholar
… [9] Had there been a challenge to the sufficiency of notice, that under the right circumstances
might shift the burden to the Debtor. Hill v. Smith, 260 US 592, 595 (1923) …
might shift the burden to the Debtor. Hill v. Smith, 260 US 592, 595 (1923) …
BUILDING AND REALTY INSTITUTE WESTCHESTER v. New York
Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, 2024 - Google Scholar
… [2] A facial regulatory taking is effected when legislation goes "too far" in restricting the use of
property. Horne, 576 US at 360 (quoting Pa. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 US 393, 415 (1922)) …
property. Horne, 576 US at 360 (quoting Pa. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 US 393, 415 (1922)) …
Albert v. FRANCHOT
Dist. Court, D. Maryland, 2024 - Google Scholar
… v. Mahon, 260 US 393, 416 (1922).]. In Garza v. Woods, the plaintiffs challenged the
constitutionality of Arizona's unclaimed property statute. Garza v. Woods, Case No …
constitutionality of Arizona's unclaimed property statute. Garza v. Woods, Case No …
KOSEY v. County of Santa Cruz
Dist. Court, ND California, 2024 - Google Scholar
… of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 US 562, 564 (2000) (citing Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota
County, 260 US 441 (1923) and Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co …
County, 260 US 441 (1923) and Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co …
Kidd v. MAYORKAS
Dist. Court, CD California, 2024 - Google Scholar
… "A license may be implied from the habits of the country," McKee v. Gratz, 260 US 127, 136 (1922),
and "the knocker on the front door is treated as an invitation or license to attempt an …
and "the knocker on the front door is treated as an invitation or license to attempt an …