There is insufficient evidence of trying, and failing to resolve the dispute, as well as of the dispute itself. Therefore, this Rfc is likely to be deleted within 48hrs if there is no change to the evidence in these 3 sections. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's but one of the many times someone tried to lay out what was going on and not just play intellectual ping-pong: (in this case, me, coming into the issue late):

So, uh, to recap: does anyone other than Femmina have a problem with the iPhone being referred to in passing as a "camera phone"? It looks to me like there's pretty clear consensus that it is a "camera phone". But, I, too, invoke tl;dr. – ɜɿøɾɪɹℲ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 22:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

so it seems to me that your point is null. – ɜɿøɾɪɹℲ _{( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs )} 15:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I noticed this just today... There are just two things I want to say:

• I didn't vandalize anything.
• My point is valid.

It may be true that I stretched that consesus thing a bit, but I was alone against many in that discussion, so you have to understand me. But whatever... I'll not be back to the iPhone talk page for a while, at least until I'll be able to find so much time to waste.

People like this involved in Wikipedia force me to question my contribution to, and the value of, the site in general. Phooto

This emo comment made my day. Can I consider it a personal attack? - Femmina (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]