Eastern Orthodoxy WikiProject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to the assessment department of the Eastern Orthodoxy WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Eastern Orthodoxy related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Eastern Orthodoxy articles by quality and Category:Eastern Orthodoxy articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Eastern Orthodoxy WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions[edit]
Quality assessments[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | ![]() |
|
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | ![]() |
|
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | ![]() |
|
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | ![]() |
|
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale[edit]
Importance assessment[edit]
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles) | ??? |
Importance scale[edit]
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Divinization (Christian) - Did an extensive cleanup and citation cleanup. Please reassess and rate importance. ReformedArsenal (talk) 14:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Holy Trinity Monastery (Jordanville) - Extensive additions with additions. Etoyasu (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2013 (EST)
- Panagia Episkopi - translated the article from the German. Some comments on the talk page are way above my level of expertise to answer. Based on my interpretation of the quality scale, it should be a B. --Slashme (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Assessment log[edit]
Eastern Orthodoxy articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
June 26, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Nikolay Kotelnikov (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
June 25, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Monastery of the Holy Spirit, Vilnius (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 23, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Marcian of Syracuse (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Julitta of Armenia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 22, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Anna Avramea (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Jacqueline Lafontaine-Dosogne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Marcian of Syracuse (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Renata Lavagnini (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Sylvester Hulevych (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)