Cannabis Ruderalis


Let There Be Sunshine

Let There Be Sunshine (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

25 July 2018[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Efforts of a Editor to create a wiki film page of Love Action Drama .not beginned film. with different sock accounts. [1]

Appukuttans:- Beginned the journey as always (there are similar film pages like the same). created the link. [2]

Akshay P V Kanhangad:- New account creating the Love Action Drama page like an expert.but with poor reference.Because film not started yet. [3]

A editor named kailash reverted their try showing the reasons [4]

2405:204:D181:1FC0:C180:CDAD:16EA:9FD4 :- Again trying his best to active the page [5]

137.97.185.48 :- other Ip supports same day as planned [6] Three man army.

Akshay P V Kanhangad :- Back in action same day after few mins.remember he is not a active wikipedia editor.and started support. [7]

Let There Be Sunshine :- Master sock also in action with some correction for showing his precence to other editors.like he checked everything and all is well. [8]

but failing [9]


There are many Overlapping edits in many pages Let There Be Sunshine and Appukuttans have. Some film pages they maintains like they owning the page.

some other pages

Kayamkulam Kochunni (2018 film)

same formula Appukuttans create the page [10]

Let There Be Sunshine helps [11]

137.97.8.109 same range Ip also helps [12]


other few films they created in the same way before film start shooting :- Panchavarnathatha,Naam (2018 film),Aami,Mulakuppadam Films,Thondimuthalum Driksakshiyum

same workflow. There are many similar pages like this. I can give proof if needed.I believe these accounts promoting and degrading people and films with different accounts,(might be money involved) like let there be sunshine follow the rules.he has his own set of rules while adding star cast and cast all to films [13].so other accounts he uses to oppose the same. Sameershan (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Insufficient evidence and probably retaliatory as the alleged master named the filer as a puppet in another case. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Leave a Reply