Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin


Jameslovesavril

Jameslovesavril (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 June 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

AvrilParamore27 (talk · contribs) is a sock →AzaToth 13:28, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
16 June 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Block evasion by Sockpuppet of indef banned user:- Jameslovesavril, Note duplication of editing by his last blocked sockpuppets WeLoveParamore27 and 90.201.170.166 to the Cheadle, Greater Manchester Article. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Blocked and tagged.—Kww(talk) 02:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

25 June 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


IP mentioned in previous SPI, but not blocked with other sockpuppets. User us still using it for block evasion. See this Diff for one of several examples. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Previous SPI:- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jameslovesavril/Archive[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • What is the previous SPI? --Rschen7754 10:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: IP appears to refresh slowly, blocked one month. Closing. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 12:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17 August 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Editing style and disruptive changes to articles, which are reversed by multiple editors, is identical those by indef banned user Jameslovesavril and his blocked sockpuppets:- Jameslovesavrilavigne, Weloveparamore27 and Danisnotonfirefan. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jameslovesavril/Archive Richard Harvey (talk) 13:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Clerk note: I've blocked the sockpuppet. In the future, to expedite your case, please include diffs showing the sockpuppet activity. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19 August 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Jameslovesavril had another sockpuppet:- TheSimsChicago45 indef blocked yesterday. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jameslovesavril/Archive. He has today created this latest sock FloridaCaliforniaToronto27 for Block Evasion and reverted removal of his previous sockpuppet editing from yesterday. See this diff:- [2]. An additional edit he made, using this new sock, was to revert another reversal of his sockpuppets edits Danisnotonfirefan, which has also been indef blocked, See this Diff:- [3]. This is an identical edit he has done to the same article using another of his, now blocked, socks:- User:AvrilParamore27, see this diff:- [4], which was used to follow an edit by his supposedly main Username of Jameslovesavril. In view of his persistent sockpuppeting, see:- Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jameslovesavril I would also request that checkuser is used to locate any other sockpuppets he has created, which may remain dormant. Richard Harvey (talk) 20:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - to locate possible sleepers. I've already blocked but not tagged yet pending CU results.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 22:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Courcelles 00:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Accepting that to mean there are no sleepers, tagging and closing.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jameslovesavril/Archive

Leave a Reply