James Cantor (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

17 October 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

• Banglange (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Starburst9 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro forma, see below. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

• I compared James Cantor and Banglange based on a private tip. Technical data puts the two as  Likely; additionally, Banglange and Starburst9 are  Confirmed to each other. Behavioral evidence supports the technical evidence here. This is both evasion of scrutiny (due to both socks editing James Cantor) and an IBAN violation (due to both socks editing Andrea James) - see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology#Jokestress_and_James_Cantor_mutual_interaction_ban.  Blocked and tagged. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]