The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 16:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Inappropriate redirect from a very general term to the title of a specific music work --Shirahadasha 01:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a few overWP:LINKed pages point here inadvertently, so in all instances the redir is used it's inappropriate. Potatoswatter 04:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 16:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

An implausible title to redirect from. Has been speedy deleted in the past, but was restored by Rossami citing an "invalid speedy deletion". Harryboyles 04:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Links to special pages do not work. Gavia immer (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Gavia immer. JuJube 19:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Idiotic spelling of special. And very unlikely. TheBlazikenMaster 00:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  The spelling is not 'idiotic', rather it is German. It is, however, unnecessary – Gurch 09:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 16:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

redirect was used once (has been fixed), unlikely search term Lars T. 15:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: the plausible search term would be Bürgermeister, Buergemeister or Burgemeister. Pavel Vozenilek 22:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, although actually, "Burgomaster" is not completely implausible, but the idea that someone who would misspell so badly would then go on to type "Frankfurt-am-Main" does take this into the realm of serious, major implausibility. Xtifr _tälk 16:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Kept. Converted to article. -- JLaTondre 17:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance not really significant enough for a redirect Simonadams 17:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Write the article ; I'd like to read it. But if no one can do that, then delete. --Trovatore 18:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that the article is so great, but its no longer a redirect (its a book by Cicero, link to imt still there). I haven't ever done much here, so I didn't remove rfd tag or speedy close or anything (should I have?). Best, Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good for a quick first stab at a stub. I do note that the article was deleted before (which is probably how it ended up as a redirect), but the deletion log says, "just a quote", and you obviously have more than that, so it shouldn't be deleted as a recreation. I wouldn't worry about closing; someone will be motivated to do so soon enough. :) Xtifr _tälk 17:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.