The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was merge with main page. kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Rules for Fools[edit]

Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:IAR, all rules are to be ignored. Wikipedia is also not a guidebook on what users should do. ^{[April Fools!]}

(Yes, I'm aware the reasoning I gave is flimsier than a cardboard boat, thanks.) -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 04:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Tag as historical? North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Sounds like you need Wikipedia:Requests for process. Stifle (talk) 10:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Strongest possible delete, because a true fool heeds no rules. --Gimubrc (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per reasons described above and because it would give admins more to do. Har. Peter Sam Fan 15:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete immediately. Don't give the vandals ideas! Tom29739 ^[talk] 17:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Nuke it epicgenius @ 18:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC) (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• SPEEDY KEEP VANDALISM FORWIN VANDALFORWIN 4WIN 4WIN AHAHAHAAHAHAH 23q892q389r293 editorEهեইдအ😎 22:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Rhyming essay titles are unacceptable. Eman235/talk 23:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.