The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep, non-admin closure by the nom (because I was being a dick). Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 15:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ashish410[edit]

User talk:Ashish410 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Not really a proper talk page, but a test page. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 07:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep a new user decides to use their talk page for an editing test (nothing wrong with that) and you nominated it for deletion one minute later. Haven't you heard of WP:BITE? Hut 8.5 08:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep an entirely harmless user talkpage. Rather than nominating it for deletion, a nice welcome message would have been more constructive. Miss E. Lovetinkle (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Just a normal user talk page, a few editing tests won't make it inappropriate. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Island Monkey even posted the talk page notice to delete on that page, indicating a use for it. Perhaps Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Ashish410 should have been co nominated! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep...a less bitey thing to do would be simply to leave a message on the talk page informing the user to use a subpage or the sandbox for test edits. --Anthem 13:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep--WP:BITE. --E♴(talk) 14:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.