The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was I've deleted this, it's being used only for disruption. Obviously you can recreate (or ask someone to restore) the page if you want to use it for your own userspace, but you can't just go sneaking it in to other people's userpages, putting it on talk pages, or in project page discussions. Prodego ^talk 03:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zalgo/Oh[edit]

User:Zalgo/Oh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is only being used disruptively. All inclusions of the template were slipped into another person's userpage without their consent. Guerillero | My Talk 08:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Doesn't seem to serve any Encyclopedic purpose. Barts1a | What did I actually do right? | What did I do wrong this time? 08:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There appear to be other pages that need attention, see Special:PrefixIndex/User:Zalgo/. I have left a question here to find out if the user is aware they have two of Zalgo's templates transcluded into their talk page. Johnuniq (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I can't tell if this nom is serious... If it is you have a strange definition of disruptive. This post of mine might be considered disruptive if I thought this nom were serious. The talk page bomb I was left gave me a cheerful smile, as I'm sure it did to the others. By the way, did anyone actually bring this up with the user first? Of get an answer as to whether any of the recipients felt... disrupted?    Thorncrag  18:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • He was warned for disruptive editing due to this template. I don't mind the talk page bombing; I mind the fact that he inserts this into random people's headers. (Not to mention that the pedobear is a piece of non free media but that is a whole other can of worms) --Guerillero | My Talk 21:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • May i remind you WP:NOTCENSORED. I'm a troll... So ta <3 --Zalgo (talk) 02:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • WP:CENSORED does not excuse disruptive editing like what you are doing! Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 02:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete: Wikipedia shouldn't be a breeding ground for trolls. Pilif12p 03:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.