The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nextiva[edit]

Draft:Nextiva (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

putting this on ice for some time now as it doesn't pass notability according to community. Gachangi (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There is an active AfD from before the article was moved to Draft space - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination). Jbh^Talk 16:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as I still concur what I said at the AfDs, nothing at all close and, although this could at least be considered improvements, it's still not enough and it's concerning as it is the deletions. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No point in keeping this. When the current AfD closes that will be 4 AfDs and a couple deletion reviews that have said this is a non-notable company. Jbh^Talk 06:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination). Salt is even justified, as mentioned in the AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.