Cannabis Ruderalis

June 24[edit]

File:Edwin McMillan Nobel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edwin McMillan Nobel.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Materialscientist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Challenging "Keep local": The argument presented, that it may no be PD in the US, is confusing for two reasons. Firstly, it is PD in the US as a Swedish simple photograph created before 1969, since it was not copyrighted in Sweden on the URAA date, January 1st 1996, and secondly, if it were copyrighted in the US, we could not keep it here either, since the English Wikipedia only goes by US copyright. Felix QW (talk) 07:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slcrew.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 2. plicit 23:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slcrew.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GLA-Albanian Lictor Youth symbol.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:GLA-Albanian Lictor Youth symbol.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low-quality, unused and redundant to File:Djelmnia e Liktorit Shqiptar.svg; not eligible for speedy deletion because the file extension is not the same. Felix QW (talk) 10:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me² (Red Dwarf).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me² (Red Dwarf).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Matthew (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another unnecessary unfree image, also RD sure uses this trope a lot. Dronebogus (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me2 gazpacho globe.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me2 gazpacho globe.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nreive (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unnecessary unfree image that illustrates nothing Dronebogus (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely fails WP:NFCC#5 as well, given its context in the associated article Me². –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Red dwarf end cut scene.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red dwarf end cut scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nreive (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not useful enough to justify inclusion Dronebogus (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Back to Reality (Red Dwarf).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back to Reality (Red Dwarf).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by $CyBeRwIz$ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Nonessential unfree image Dronebogus (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:700 Coastliner 2010-2015 logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:700 Coastliner 2010-2015 logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iveco 59-12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Article currently has 3 bus images all showing new and old logos on them therefore imho making this logo redundant - the logo isn't discussed in the article so fails WP:NFCC8, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:700 Coastliner logo (2015-2021).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:700 Coastliner logo (2015-2021).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davey2010 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Article currently has 3 bus images all showing new and old logos on them therefore imho making this logo redundant - the logo isn't discussed in the article so fails WP:NFCC8, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Engine House No. 8 Robinson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Engine House No. 8 Robinson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violation of WP:NFCC#8: There is no sourced critical discussion about this text in the article. It's only mentioned in a single sentence. People do not need to see a picture of it to understand that sentence.

Violation of WP:NFCC#3b: This is a quite long textual work. There is no need to include every word from this text. The word count could be significantly reduced. Stefan2 (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. Absent any sourced critical commentary specific to the work itself, the brief sentence about it in the current version of Engine House No. 8 (Columbus, Ohio)#History isn't a sufficient justification (at least in my opinion) for using the file in that article per WP:NFC#CS. Moreover, any argument that the file needs so big so that the reader can read makes little sense since the thumbnail markup used for the image pretty much already makes it very difficult if not impossible for readers to read, In addition, there's really no need per MOS:TEXTASIMAGES for images of text to be used per se. If the text itself is really what matters, then there's no reason why it can't be quoted, reliably sourced and added to the article in some other freely equivalent way per WP:FREER. Finally, just going to point out that even though there's an article about Aminah Robinson, the artist who created this work, there's no mention of the work anywhere in that article, which gives the impression that it was not really considered one of their more significant works. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get why you are all so hostile to hosting content that helps readers. The text is legible in this image, and helps the reader to understand the artist's message and intent. A low-res jpg does nothing there, for this text-based artwork. As well, unfortunately there isn't a whole lot of text available to cite in the article, but it still is an important work by an important artist that is relevant to the station, and elevates its importance. I am not sure why such deletionist stances are being taken here, what good does it do? ɱ (talk) 02:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leave a Reply