THC Science

August 16[edit]

File:Be Better Than Your BS book.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused file Estopedist1 (talk) 05:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultipa logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused file Estopedist1 (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shore ciity.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

blocked user. Unlike that copyright holder of his uploadings Estopedist1 (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - Uploader has other copyright violations, and the claim of being the copyright holder for these images is not credible. The images are varying sizes and many with our EXIF. File:Shore city 2.jpg uploaded on 6 December 2019 can be found here with an upload date of 10 June 2019 attributed to Phillip S. -- Whpq (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as per explanations above, unlikely to be own work, not least because 1 of them has demonstrably shown not to be in the above comment. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:P. Venu, Prem Nazir and Vijaya Nirmala during the making of Udhyogastha.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

three uploadings. None has a source Estopedist1 (talk) 06:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Annapolis Tallyn-Ridge Thumbnail (1).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

problematic files. First two are derived work without original source Estopedist1 (talk) 07:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DUFC Crest.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former logo, doesn't significantly enhance the article, as there's only a little amount of unsourced text about former team logos. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and also WP:NFCC#3- minimal use of non-free images in an article Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DUFCcrest.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former logo, doesn't significantly enhance the article, as there's only a little amount of unsourced text about former team logos. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and also WP:NFCC#3- minimal use of non-free images in an article Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edward Clodd and Phyllis née Rope.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the photo was published only in 2017, it is in the public domain in the UK, but not in the US. — Ирука¹³ 10:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Qatari football teams' former logos[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 13:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All former logos, none of which significantly enhance the articles. All fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items Joseph2302 (talk) 11:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I merged all the logos into one discussion for convenience, as they all have the same issue, and are similar as former logos of Qatari football teams. No-one else has commented, so this shouldn't affect discussion. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added File:Umm Salal SC logo.png which currently also only is used along with the other Umm Salal former logo in a gallery.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Al-Sadd fan club.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fan logo which does not significantly enhance the article (which is about the team, not the fans club), and so fails WP:NFCC#8 Joseph2302 (talk) 11:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of Arms of ancient Algeria.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image was created by Nourerrahmane from other images. I ask other participants of the project to evaluate the image from the point of view WP:ORIGINAL. I would also like to know who this "Histoires et traditions d'Algérie" is. In addition, the source list contains works from the 20th century that are still likely to be copyrighted. — Ирука¹³ 12:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Coa is well sourced, you'll do yourself a favour reading those listed below the image, as they discribe exactly the coa's form, colors, timeline and use.

The image was created by "Histoires et traditions d'Algérie" which wasn't placed under copyright. and does it matter who he is ? are you intrested in who i am also ?

Thanks. Nourerrahmane (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you posted a file created by another person, you need to verify its license with permissions-en@wikimedia.org. — Ирука¹³ 13:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you can check the website i took the Coa from, if you find any indication on copyright please tell me. Nourerrahmane (talk) 13:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

since there is no response from your part, then it would be good to remove this tag, next time please take your time to properly check the sources (all of whom are public domain and go back to the 19th century). Nourerrahmane (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mohun Bagan A.C. logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except for Mohun Bagan AC -FASTILY 06:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the logo of the general sports club Mohun Bagan AC. The only acceptable logos for the articles Mohun Bagan AC (cricket) and Mohun Bagan AC (field hockey) would be a specific logo for those teams, not this generic logo. This logo should be removed from all articles except for Mohun Bagan AC sports club. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Armourers of the Royal Air Force attach rockets to a Bristol Beaufighter aircraft of 45 Squadron prior to its flying a strike operation on a communist terrorist target in the Malayan jungle.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete File:Malaya Regiment - Malayan Emergency.jpg -FASTILY 06:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-commercial license. — Ирука¹³ 14:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image was tagged originally as F3 as the source site indicates that photos are available for non-commercial use. The Imperial War Museum has charge of many photos, but it is not clear that this image is still under copyright so taking it here for discussion as the deletion is not unambiguous. The description indicates that the image is the work of an RAF photographer, and so would be subject to Crown Copyright. There is no specific date provided for the image but the image from the Malayan Emergency with a range of 1948-1960. Crown copyright prior to 30 June 1957 is 50 years after creation, but after that is 50 years after publication. If more detailed information about the photo is available, copyright status could be ascertained. Whpq (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added another file with identical issue -- Whpq (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No 45 Squadron stopped operating Beaufighters in 1950 (Halley, James J. (1988). The Squadrons of the Royal Air Force & Commonwealth 1918–1988. Tonbridge, UK: Air Britain (Historians) Ltd). pp. 100–101. ISBN 0-85130-164-9.) - so File:Armourers of the Royal Air Force attach rockets to a Bristol Beaufighter aircraft of 45 Squadron prior to its flying a strike operation on a communist terrorist target in the Malayan jungle.jpg will be pd-uk.Nigel Ish (talk) 07:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I agree that establishes this as PD from expired Crown copyright. We just have the regiment image that has unclear licensing. -- Whpq (talk) 00:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super NES designs.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded with sourced critical commentary explicitly discussing this image in-depth -FASTILY 06:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the point that this image is trying to make is that the super nintendo was going to look dramatically different during the design process, fair use is as a last resort, the information that this non-free image is trying to convey can perfectly be addressed in text form. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am not sure how these drastically different designs can be addressed in text while still being understandable. Concept artwork is one of the widely accepted things that can exist on a page alongside the final design of something, because it shows an encyclopedic aspect of the thing's creation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful for article and its hard for a reader to understand with just text alone Qwv (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing to meet WP:NFCC#8. There is no sourced critical commentary about this alternate design in the article. It is just plunked into the article with a caption. -- Whpq (talk) 22:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFCC#8 as per Whpq. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angels would fall alt.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This cover artwork was used only for promotional purposes in the United States and Mexico, so it was not widely available to the public. It also does not provide any additional context to the article in which it appears, possibly failing WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 18:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Signing of the Treaty of Brussels.ogv[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader stated that the video is for "visual identification" of the subject. This is already done by the photograph in the article so it doesn't meet WP:NFCC#1. It is copyrighted because copyright in Belgium is life of all the authors plus 70 years. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 20:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oop, it looks like the uploader was also blocked for copyright violations. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 20:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFCC#1 as free image File:Pact van Brussel, Bevin tekent.jpg exists. Also fails WP:NFCC#8, as it doesn't significantly enhance a reader's understanding of the topic. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

THC Science

Bringing Science to the Cannabis Conversation!

Cannabis Ruderalis

August 16[edit]

File:Be Better Than Your BS book.jpeg[edit]

File:Ultipa logo.png[edit]

File:Shore ciity.jpg[edit]

File:P. Venu, Prem Nazir and Vijaya Nirmala during the making of Udhyogastha.jpg[edit]

File:Annapolis Tallyn-Ridge Thumbnail (1).jpg[edit]

File:DUFC Crest.JPG[edit]

File:DUFCcrest.png[edit]

File:Edward Clodd and Phyllis née Rope.jpg[edit]

Qatari football teams' former logos[edit]

File:Al-Sadd fan club.jpg[edit]

File:Coat of Arms of ancient Algeria.png[edit]

File:Mohun Bagan A.C. logo.svg[edit]

File:Armourers of the Royal Air Force attach rockets to a Bristol Beaufighter aircraft of 45 Squadron prior to its flying a strike operation on a communist terrorist target in the Malayan jungle.jpg[edit]

File:Super NES designs.png[edit]

File:Angels would fall alt.jpg[edit]

File:Signing of the Treaty of Brussels.ogv[edit]

Leave a Reply