Cannabis Ruderalis

December 3[edit]

File:CJC Computer sm.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CJC Computer sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by C J Cowie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 02:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Obviously delete both for the same reason. Salavat (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • This file has two versions, one of a person and another of a computer, so folks should probably say which version they mean (one or both). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The nomination is for both images -FASTILY 02:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crocodile Kippah.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crocodile Kippah.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Debresser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This fails NFCC wrt omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This is a product out of many chosen using no appreciable criteria, on an article for which we already are using non-free content to illustrate the subject in the infobox. While this may be useful on a main article for Crocodile Kippahs, that's not the subject of this article, and that this could just as easily be replaced with non-free media of any of their other products illustrates how non-essential and arbitrary the use of this image is. GMGtalk 19:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. The other non-free image is the company logo, and this is the only other image in the article, and illustrates the rather exotic product of this manufacturing firm, which is not something the reader would be able to imagine without this image. Debresser (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Regardless of the WP:NFCC#8 issue, it fails WP:NFCC#1; anyone can buy it and take their own photo of it and license accordingly. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If one were to remove any image that could theoretically be replaced by a yet to be made by somebody free image, then we would have no free-use images. This one is no exception, and there is no likelihood of a free image of this luxury object being created any time soon. 22:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Debresser (talk)
But we do delete such images. And not every non-free image is like that. You can't replace Afghan Girl by taking a photograph of an Afghan girl. That's not a free equivalent. You can't replace photographs of deceased people with scribbles of your own either, because those would be either not free (if they are derivative works of non-free photographs) or equivalents (in so far as your drawing abilities do not match a camera's). But anything that is even theoretically replaceable by a free equivalent is replaceable as far as the policy is concerned. It doesn't have to be convenient or without cost to you, but possible. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pir Syed Murtaza Amin Shah-photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pir Syed Murtaza Amin Shah-photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zirkawa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No verification. Photo is obvious copyvio. --Saqib (talk) 07:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Celebrationvideo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celebrationvideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8, there's nothing in the article that cannot be used simply by words and removal is not detrimental. —IB [ Poke ] 10:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul Danan Big Brothers Bit On The Side.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Danan Big Brothers Bit On The Side.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SassySarahlong (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This photo was posted by Sam Bailey (the female in the photo) on her official Twitter account on 11 July 2016 along with three other photos (here). It appears to be a selfie taken by Bailey herself, and there is no evidence of permission. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 14:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abhishek Chatterjee.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhishek Chatterjee.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aankan Das (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed as own work, the uploader has a history of copyright violations. There is no good reason to believe this own work as claimed. The EXIF data indicates this was taken from Facebook. Whpq (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leave a Reply