The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:QLKPATCH.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bemiller (notify | contribs).

• Looks out of scope...or whatever dictates images here. ViperSnake151 02:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Quan Li K'an, described at length on the image page, has no Wikipedia article. This site uses the image in question; "Bruce Everett Miller" (uploader?) is named (as author?) on that site. Google Image hits show this image used only by "Bruce Everett Miller" and one person who claims to be taking his class, so it's not established this emblem is used outside Mr Miller's class. No linking pages on Wikipedia, unestablished notability, possible WP:COI self-promotion. If kept, I'd say move it to Commons:Category:Martial arts. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus--Aervanath (talk) 11:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JD Salinger.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Daniel Case (notify | contribs).

• Non-free image where the copyright holder is unknown (all source information is just a link to a blog hosting a copy of the file). The image rights may belong, for instance, to an photo agency. Damiens.rf 03:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the image credit accompanying this New York Times piece, copyright is held by the University of New Hampshire. It's not the exact same image, but note the clothing and the backdrop ... it's another one from Jacobi's shoot. I have so amended the tag and I would really like to keep this one, because it's a somewhat iconic picture of the author (granted, because no new official photos have been taken of him since then). Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an important and rare view of Salinger...The tag is now amended...Modernist (talk) 04:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it still is not clear who owns the copyright. The Lotte Jacobi collection includes "hundreds of family snapshots, and numerous photographs given to Lotte by other distinguished photographers."[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the copyright holder can be identified. I'd be prepared to concede that the image is not replaceable by a free one, but at the moment it fails WP:NFCC#10a. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that when you donate pictures to a library, particularly after death, the copyrights go along with it unless otherwise specified. In fact, Jen, I think some of your featured picture nominations have been of photos that were taken by private photographers and donated to the Library of Congress after death, therefore putting them in the public domain (I'm thinking of the B&W one of that Chilean cowboy, not a gaucho ... can't remember the right word and too late to look it up). Daniel Case (talk) 09:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about someone actually calls up the UNH library and clarifies that a) the picture was taken by Jacobi (I think it's pretty obvious that it was; in fact it is credited as such here) and b) that the library itself owns the copyrights as a result of the donation. Daniel Case (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheSouthStreet_in1927.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guucancat (notify | contribs).

• no source, not really useful without one, and user has awful copyright track record so i think purging where possible is prudent Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheSouthStreet_in1927.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guucancat (notify | contribs).

• no source, not really useful without one, and user has awful copyright track record so i think purging where possible is prudent Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not in use, not informative, suspicious uploader history. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dominatrix, with crop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oaktowndrummer (notify | contribs).

• Given source (http://www.mistresssaskia.com/) states explicitly on front page that

  all graphics, pictures and text are the property of iconoblast & mistressaskia.com (C) all rights reserved.

  Doesn't sound GFDL-compatible to me. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 14:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimag3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erick Rams (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, unstated target article/encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Similar File:Wikimag4.jpg in use in article Alejandro Honda. Nominated image is same size, and contains "errors" according to my FireFox. / edg ☺ ☭ 19:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erick Rams (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, unstated target article/encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 19:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Similar File:Wikillu2.jpg in use in article Alejandro Honda. Nominated image is same size, and contains "errors" according to my FireFox. (These files could be more descriptively named.) / edg ☺ ☭ 19:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goog411 Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The New Mikemoral (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Image Labeler Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The New Mikemoral (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Patent Search Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The New Mikemoral (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.