1. [Kwork2] agree[s] to edit only from one account (Kwork2). [Kwork2] must gain the permission of the Arbitration Committee in advance before any of (a) requesting [their] account be renamed, (b) editing using another username, (c) editing while logged out.
2. Should [Kwork2] make any edits which are judged by an uninvolved administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, [Kwork2] may be blocked without further warning.
3. [Kwork2 is] topic banned from all pages related to (a) The Israel-Palestine conflict and relations between Israel and Palestine; and (b) Judaism, both broadly interpreted.

These restrictions may be enforced at Arbitration Enforcement by blocks of increasing fixed length for the first three breaches, and by indefinite block for a fourth offence. An indefinite block may be appealed only to the Arbitration Committee by email, shorter blocks may be appealed at AE.

1. Your indefinite topic ban from all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed imposed on 15 May 2014 remains in force, subject to the usual enforcement procedures.
2. You are be limited to one account.
3. You are required to remain civil. As a condition of your unblock, you must acknowledge that any edit which, in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, contains personal attacks or gross incivility will be met with blocks of escalating length, ending with an indefinite block after the fourth offense.
4. Blocks under clause 3 may be appealed to AE, excepting an indefinite block, which can be appealed to BASC only.
5. These restrictions will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions. A copy of these restrictions will be placed on your user talk page, they must not be removed until at least 1 month after your most recent block (for any reason).
6. These sanctions will expire 12 months after your ban is lifted, or 12 months from most recent block, whichever is later, even if such block is not imposed under these sanctions. (Note that your topic ban mentioned in the first clause will not automatically expire, that will have to be appealed in the normal manner.)

5.1) The Committee expects that the disputes and disruption underlying this case will cease as a result of this decision. In the event of non-compliance or a continued pattern of disputes, further review by the Committee may be sought after a reasonable time. In such a review, the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions including but not limited to the revocation of any user's privilege to use automated tools such as bots and scripts, revocation of other privileges, topic bans, civility restrictions, or any other remedies needed to end the disruption. Nothing in this paragraph restricts the authority of administrators to take appropriate action to deal with any disruptive incidents that may occur.

Motion: Pursuant to the provisions of Remedy 5.1, and mindful of the recent and current disputes surrounding this user in many fora, the committee by motion indefinitely topic-bans Δ (formerly known as Betacommand) from making any edit enforcing the non-free content criteria, broadly construed. User:Δ is also formally reminded of the civility restriction and other terms to which they are still subject as a condition of the provisional suspension of their community ban.

Creating any articles or draft articles in any namespace.

Moving any page into the article namespace from any other namespace.

Other editors may move pages created or substantially edited by RAN, but only if they explicitly take responsibility for any copyright violations on that page.

This remedy may be appealed after the later of 6 months and when all draft articles he has authored, in his userspace and in the draft namespace, have been verified free of copyright violations and moved to the article namespace by other editors or deleted. In order for appeals of this remedy to be considered, he shall be required to submit evidence of substantial work on his part towards resolving the Contributor Copyright Investigations (CCI) filed against him, most particularly the one focused on his text contributions.

Any article or draft article created contrary to this restriction will result in a block, initially of at least one month and then proceeding per the enforcement provisions. The article or draft article may be speedily deleted under criterion G5 by any administrator.

Any page moves made contrary to this restriction may be enforced by blocks per the enforcement provisions. The page move may be reversed by any editor able to do so.

• interact with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about, Collectonian (talk · contribs), on any page in Wikipedia;
• harass or wikistalk Collectonian such as by editing pages that Collectonian has recently edited; or,
• make uncivil comments about or personal attacks upon any user.

These restrictions imposed upon Abtract shall be interpreted in a reasonable fashion so as to allow Abtract to continue with appropriate editing while preventing any further harassment of Collectonian. Any attempts to "game the system" or "wikilawyer" the details of the restrictions are unwelcome. Should Abtract violate the restrictions imposed upon him, he may be blocked for an appropriate period of time by any uninvolved administrator, with any blocks to be logged here.

Remedy 5 (SarekOfVulcan–Doncram interaction ban) of the Doncram arbitration case is suspended for a period of six months. During the period of suspension, this restriction may be reinstated by any uninvolved administrator as an arbitration enforcement action should either SarekOfVulcan or Doncram fail to adhere to Wikipedia editing standards in their interactions with each other. Appeal of such a reinstatement would follow the normal arbitration enforcement appeals process. After six months from the date this motion is enacted, if the restriction has not been reinstated or any reinstatements have been successfully appealed, the restriction will automatically lapse.

Should Cirt's continued editing raise further concerns about his compliance with the BLP policy, the Committee may expand the scope of this restriction by motion to include all editing relating to living persons. Conversely, if Cirt conforms his future editing to applicable policies and the principles set forth in this decision and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs, he may submit a request for amendment after one year from the date of this decision seeking a relaxation of this restriction.

BarkingFish will be permitted to operate only one account.

The ban will expire after one year of sanction-free editing."

1. [WPPilot] may edit only from one account (user:WPPilot) and [they] must get the permission of the arbitration committee before editing under any other name (including editing while logged out).
2. [WPPilot is] formally topic banned from all pages related to legal actions involving [themselves] and/or organisations [they] have close ties with
3. [WPPilot is] strongly warned to abide by all Wikipedia policies, explicitly including those related to copyright and conflicts of interest.

• Any breach of condition 1 will result in an immediate indefinite block for all [their] accounts.
• Any breaches of conditions 2 or 3 may be enforced at Arbitration enforcement with blocks of escalating length, ending with an indefinite block after a fourth offence.
• Indefinite blocks may be appealed only to the Arbitration Committee by email, shorter blocks may be appealed on your talk page or at Arbitration enforcement.

Administrators who receive requests for sanctions are requested to inform the Arbitration Committee by email.

The topic-ban imposed in this decision applies to all pages in all namespaces. However, the topic-ban does not preclude Lsorin from (1) responding to good-faith, reasonable inquiries from other editors on his user talkpage seeking information about the Coanda(-1910, as long as Lsorin does not misuse this permission; (2) participating in the arbitration enforcement discussion of any allegation that he violated the topic-ban; or (3) posting an authorized request for the lifting or modification of the topic-ban after the specified time period has elapsed.

1. Updated by motion: Abd is indefinitely prohibited from discussing any dispute in which he is not an originating party. This includes, but is not limited to, article talk and user talk pages, the administrator noticeboards, and any formal or informal dispute resolution pages. He may, however, vote or comment at polls.
2. Imposed by motion: Abd (talk · contribs) and William M. Connolley (talk · contribs) shall not interact with each other, nor comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about each other, on any page in Wikipedia. Should either editor do so, he may be blocked by any administrator for a short time, up to one week.

• Tobias Conradi may be blocked up to an hour by any administrator for any personal attack or violation of civility. Blocks need not be logged.
• Tobias Conradi is limited to one revert per week on any article. This includes moves.
• Tobias Conradi is prohibited from maintaining laundry lists of grievances.

• Original TBAN, 2019-08-30
• Appeal successful, 2020-07-06
• Ban reinstated, 2020-11-05

1. User:Reece Leonard is indefinitely topic-banned from Artpop, Lady Gaga and related articles.
2. User:Reece Leonard is subject to a mutual interaction ban with User:STATicVapor.

These restrictions can be appealed on AN/ANI no sooner than 6 months after their implementation.

• You are restricted to using only the User:EddieSegoura account.
• You are topic banned from "railroad switches", broadly construed, which expressly includes "exicornt"
• Violations of either of the above conditions (and only those two) will result in the community site ban being automatically reinstated.

2) Before he makes any content revert (including vandalism), he is required to first open a discussion on the article talk page, to provide an explanation of his intended revert and then wait 6 hours before actually making it to allow time for discussion

Original restrictions, never appealed:

1. is not allowed to use Huggle
2. is subject to a 1RR restriction, i.e not allowed to revert more than once per day in a dispute

Past restrictions, successfully repealed but then reimposed by Nick-D on 6 October 2012 and "re-reimposed" and clarified by Floquenbeam on 22 August 2017):

1. is topic banned from all noticeboards, including ArbCom case requests and cases
2. is topic banned from all contentious articles and their talk pages

See also

1. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barts1a/Archive, user has operated multiple alternate accounts

• LoveMonkey will not make article edits or talk page comments regarding Roman Catholic teaching or practice.
• LoveMonkey may add information about Eastern Orthodox commentary (positive or negative) on Roman Catholic teaching/practice. However, any such commentary must be clearly attributed, in the body of the article, to the specific individual or document making it. Moreover, any such commentary must be clearly identified as opinion, rather than as factual information about the nature of RC teaching/practice or its compatibility/incompatibility with EO teaching/practice.

• Topic banned from all articles related to Bangladesh, broadly construed.
• Limited to one account unless user demonstrates a clear need for a legitimate alternative account.

1. "You are topic banned from uploading any more media to Wikipedia or Commons. If you upload any more media before this topic ban is removed, you will be blocked indefinitely."
2. "Graphium is topic banned from reviewing articles at WP:AFC. The ban does not extend to talk pages at AfC nor to undertaking mentorship discussions or tutoring in the area - in fact Graphium is strongly encouraged to do so."

• Latest username for Suzanne Olsson is User:Suzanne Olsson

• Template talk pages;
• Templates sandboxes, test cases or other "non live" subtemplates used for testing;
• Documentation pages, but only as a direct result of a change to a template's code requested by Sardanaphalus.

• Topic Ban
• Site ban

• User:Middayexpress is hereby topic banned (broadly) from all Somalia-related topics. Additionally, in order to effect a timely halt to any alleged sock or meat puppets that may be editing the pages, administrators may at their discretion adopt a WP:1RR policy on all Somalia-related topics to enforce this ban. This topic ban and 1RR policy shall be in effect until such time as community consensus or arbcom supersede this ANI thread.

• Following the closure of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middayexpress, Middayexpress (talk · contribs) et al are now indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. In order to effect a timely halt to Middayexpress's sockpuppets and/or meatpuppets, administrators may at their discretion take any and all measures deemed necessary and appropriate to safeguard articles from Middayexpress's edits, including (but not limited to) standard discretionary sanctions as may be warranted on a case by case basis provided that such measures are undertaken through appropriate channels or with the consensus of the community. Editors encountering suspected Middayexpress sockpuppets are required to log the suspected account(s) at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middayexpress to allow for comparison of the suspect accounts to the account master and to ensure an accurate and up-to-date list of known sock accounts for future reference.

• Initial topic ban ANI Thread
• SPI closure resulting in Site Ban

• 2015-06-07 (initial)
• 2018-04-02 (updated)

He may participate fully in Requests for x(Admin,Crat or comment), provided he does so in a civil manner

He may initiate actions at admin boards if required (asking advice beforehand is advised)

He may participate in any board action to which he is named as a party, or he clearly and obviously has a vested interest, (asking beforehand is also advised)

While he participates in these limited ways, he understand that his behavior is to expected to be on topic and professional, as is expected of all participants. The ban is for an indefinite period of time but not infinite and can be reviewed after 90 days at WP:AN if he so chooses.

1. is forbidden, indefinitely, from uploading images which are in violation of WP:WATERMARK.
2. is forbidden, indefinitely, from attempting to change licencing conditions after upload of artwork he has created. The sole exception will be removing licencing conditions; any attempt to add or further restrict the licencing he agreed to at upload is forbidden.
3. is forbidden, indefinitely, from participating in any discussions about image policy.
4. is required, indefinitely, to prominently link all accounts he uses together at the top of each user page. (Note that on Commons such linking ended up having to be done by administrators who then had to fully protect each user page to prevent Xanderliptak from removing the linking. This may need to be done here.)
5. is required, indefinitely, to provide accurate diffs of any allegation he makes about another editor.
6. is required, indefinitely, to provide accurate diffs of any claims that another editor has said or done something.

   In regards to the above two requirements, any user may remove allegations/etc which Xanderliptak has made if he fails to provide diffs in a reasonable time.

7. is forbidden, indefinitely, from summarizing any discussions held elsewhere, and is restrained to direct comments supported by diffs only.
8. All of the above to be very broadly construed.
9. Violations to be met with the usual series of escalating blocks.
10. Restrictions to take effect on Xanderliptak's first edit (with any account) after this date, or upon granting of an unblock as listed in Proposal 3, whichever is later.
11. May appeal these restrictions six months after implementation, or six months after the end of the most recent block for violation, whichever is later.

Currently moot; user indef blocked.

Community sanction imposed from this discussion and agreement of both editors.

b.) User agrees not to edit war.

Violation of these restrictions may result in a long-term block.

Proposal: Evildoer187 to be topic banned from articles dealing with Judaism. The topic ban is indefinite, however if the editor's editing is issueless after six months an appeal might well be profitable.

• Esoglou will not make article edits or talk page comments regarding Eastern Orthodox teaching or practice.
• Esoglou may add information about Roman Catholic commentary (positive or negative) on Eastern Orthodox teaching/practice. However, any such commentary must be clearly attributed, in the body of the article, to the specific individual or document making it. Moreover, any such commentary must be clearly identified as opinion, rather than as factual information about the nature of EO teaching/practice or its compatibility/incompatibility with RC teaching/practice.

• You are hereby topic banned from uploading images on Wikipedia indefinitely.
  • Should you wish to ask for this ban to be suspended, you may do so at WP:AN after not violating the ban for 1 year.
  • If you violate this ban, you will be blocked indefinitely and a siteban will be proposed at WP:ANI (considering your past actions).

Please take the proper precautions to ensure you do not violate this ban, and I hope you realize that we are being very generous to lift this block at all. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. You are topic banned from citing any reference which includes "Halil Tekiner" as an author or otherwise invested party (supervisor, etc.) in the mainspace. You are permitted to suggest such references on article talk pages, so long as you do not do so disruptively or in high volumes.
2. You acknowledge that any future edits that give the appearance of reference spamming will result in an indefinite block.

These restrictions may be lifted at any administrator's discretion after six months without any violations. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• A TBAN on all content relating to "Mathew Klickstein" (including but not limited to creating drafts, articles, adding mentions in other articles, and using published material directly or indirectly related to Mathew Klickstein as sources)

These do not have set expiry dates and as with any editing restriction, they can be appealed on WP:AN after a reasonable time. (...)