Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

OnceRequest → Once[edit]

Status:     Not done

OnceRequest (talk) 01:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note - I have now notified the user. -- once•talk 03:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are you fr:User:Once ? They edited in June 2010 and have the claim to the SUL. –xenotalk 13:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done due to no response. Unless user is the fr.wiki user, this request should probably be declined. –xenotalk 13:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Truckerrocks → Trucker[edit]

Status:     Not done

Truckerrocks (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Your current account is very new - usurpation of existing accounts is restricted to users who have been reasonably active on Wikipedia so that we can make sure these accounts will be put to good use. WJBscribe (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Sherhill → Wow1000[edit]

Status:     Not done

Sherhill (talk) 00:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 257 undeleted edits, 8 deleted edits, and 265 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done, target user has a fair number of contributions. –xenotalk 15:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Amitparikh → Amit[edit]

Status:     Not done

 Amit  ►  20:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Although widely-registered, the name is surprisingly unused on other projects, so this request can proceed after the hold period. However, do note that you will need to usurp the account on many other projects if you want to fully unify. –xenotalk 18:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, after further review of the consequences of usurping that name, I've decided it will not be in my best interest to proceed. I therefore formally withdraw my usurpation request. Thank you, xeno, for pointing out the consequences. I will leave this request template up, and I guess an admin/bureaucrat can remove/archive it later. Thanks.  Amit  ►  19:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wasn't necessarily trying to dissuade you from taking the name, just letting you know that some work would be cut out for you to fully unify. (And heck, spelunking around on other projects taking over the name is kinda fun, if you like using web-translators and basic English ;>). –xenotalk 19:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll mark this " Not done" but feel free to change your mind and move it back to active status. –xenotalk 19:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hellahulla → HHH[edit]

Status:     Not done

Hellahulla (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Active es.wiki user HHH (talk · contribs) has claim to the SUL. –xenotalk 13:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done due to eswiki user - please choose a name that is not used on any Wikimedia projects. This tool will help. WJBscribe (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ozor Mox X → Ozormox[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Ozor Mox X (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Ozormox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 12:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: The user has no edits, no logs and no talk page. If the rename is accepted, can 'Ozormox' be changed to 'OzorMox' please?

Ozor Mox X (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • To clarify, you want your name to be "OzorMox" ? –xenotalk 15:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please. As far as I'm aware this is technically the same username as Ozormox, hence why I requested this rather than normal username change. Correct me if I'm wrong. I would also be happy with Ozor Mox if OzorMox is not possible for whatever reason. Ozor Mox X (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Similarly-named account unused and very dormant - a request for OzorMox would've been granted at WP:ACC, so I've checkY completed the rename. The usurp itself is  Not done because you didn't actually want the target name. –xenotalk 17:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I notice I can still log in to the old account with the same password. Do I need to release this account in any way or just stop using it? OzorMox (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes the old accounts gets automatically recreated (I think because of cookies and SUL). It can be safely abandoned. Thanks, –xenotalk 18:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benwha11 → ATLAS IMPACT[edit]

Status:     In progress

Benwha11 (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "ATLAS IMPACT" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done name does not exist so this belongs at WP:CHUS, but in any case target name may be promotional. –xenotalk 17:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swarm → ♠[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Swarm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: ♠ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: This user was blocked indefinitely several years ago because of the username itself. I know it's a very odd request. Users with non-Latin usernames were widely and freely blocked several years back (in this case, 2006). Users, however, aren't barred from having "symbols" as their usernames, and several do (I'm aware of the signature guidelines for such, however). A look at username policy in February 2006 shows that policy didn't support the block back then, either. So I brought a couple of long-blocked usernames to WP:AN for a review. It was pretty much decided that regardless of whether the block was inappropriate, it wouldn't make any sense whatsoever to unblock them; if the person had a new account, we would be creating a sock for them. Makes perfect sense to leave these cases blocked indefinitely even though the username shouldn't have been blocked in the first place. Considering these circumstances, I'm requesting that the typical "wait time" is ignored.

SwarmTalk 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "♠" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That is an error, obviously. SwarmTalk 17:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it is accurate (see the wikitext). Your filing had the username field filled in as "♠" whereas you should've typed ♠. Corrected. –xenotalk 13:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The policy might not forbid those usernames but imho we should not encourage their use further by renaming people to such names, which are both complicated for people to write and might break formatting and/or display of pages. I think Betacommand's rename started a trend that's ultimately harmful to this project while being of no real use to those renamed and I'd suggest the crat(s) considering this request to put it on hold until the community has discussed this and policy been changed to address it. The fact that such users were blocked in the past is indication that there might be some dispute about whether such names are desired under our username policy and we should discuss it first before proceeding with granting those requests. Regards SoWhy 17:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to seem argumentative, but one, people could either type "spade" or &spades, but it's not hard to type and it's a simple HTML symbol. Two, the policy has never forbid such names ever. All the blocks show was that the blocking admins were not completely familiar with the username policy. Admins can't block because they don't like something! Three, have these usernames ever proven to break the display of pages? A simple HTML symbol simply shouldn't do that. As far as I know, the software can support HTML symbols. They've always seemed to show up normally, like any other character. Four, this request has nothing to do with Betacommand's rename, and I was unaware there was a trend of users changing their names to symbols. If there was an ongoing discussion, I wouldn't have made this request until it was over. However, I don't think it should be prevented in anticipation of a discussion that may or may not prohibit such usernames, and would like to have this request judged based on current policy, not personal opinion or anticipation of a change in policy. SwarmTalk 04:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I merely pointed out that there a good reasons to decline such a request (another example is the automated clerk note by ClueBot above which demonstrates that automated scripts and bots might be unable to parse such usernames) and that admins back then possibly acted in what was considered consensus, even if it was not written down. As such, there is a real chance that consensus might not be in favor of such usernames and thus we might benefit from discussing it first. There is no harm to postpone this request to allow such a discussion first, so I think it would be sensible for the deciding crat to do so. But of course, no one is forced to take my advice or agree with me. Regards SoWhy 08:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just my thoughts. I would rather have a consensus one way or another, but as of right now, I don't think there's a consensus against them at all. If you or someone actually intends to start a discussion regarding this, it's only sensible to postpone the request. If not, postponing indefinitely until a discussion takes place (if ever) isn't really sensible. I don't think the issue's ever bothered the community enough to try to establish a consensus against them. The important question is whether or not they're harmful or distracting to the project. I obviously don't think so. SwarmTalk 09:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this should be discussed at WP:RFC/N prior to fulfillment? I am sympathetic to the view that these names tend to hinder collaboration and provide no particular benefit to the encyclopedia apart from an editor happy that they now have a "cool symbol name" (no doubt negatively offset by however many number of editors annoyed by it). In any case, I see no reason to ignore the hold period: someone having a symbol as a username doesn't particularly improve or maintain the encyclopedia. –xenotalk 13:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would be more willing to initiate a discussion about symbol usernames in general, rather than an RFC about an individual username. But come on, Xeno, the hold period is simply to give the owner of the account time to protest the usurpation, isn't it? Since the account is blocked it serves no purpose. You know we don't need to follow process for the sake of process. We can use common sense to ignore an unnecessary process. Forget this damn request(never mind, don't forget!), it's causing more drama then it's worth. I'll start an RFC on it. I didn't make this request because I wanted a cool username, I made it because I wanted to show that these usernames do no harm. I didn't think I'd be checked at the door. SwarmTalk 17:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So you wanted to change your username to prove a point? –xenotalk 18:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to change my username just to piss you off. Feel free to block me for disruption . SwarmTalk 21:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would you like me to mark this as {{not done}} ? ("Forget this damn request") –xenotalk 15:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uhhhh...well, whether I revisit this will depend on the outcome of the current RfC, so if it wouldn't be any trouble to leave it open, I would be in favor of that. SwarmTalk 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

←  On hold Pending the outcome of Wikipedia talk:Username policy#RfC - Are symbols as usernames allowable?. Notified target in the meantime. –xenotalk 12:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done User names are primarily intended for the purpose of collaborating and communicating with other project members. The spade symbol is a neither a glyph in any language nor a standard character on almost every keyboard, and so its use would serve as a hinderance. Pick another name and use the spade symbol as a signature (with it linking to the proper user and talk page, of course) if the spade symbol is so desired. -- Avi (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Der russische Patriot → Russe[edit]

Status:     Not done

Der russische Patriot (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 2 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 93 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've not already want to change my nick. Der russische Patriot (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The target's two edits are, IMO, not GFDL significant. One is adding an internal link, the other is changing Storyhouse to Story House. However, a user on Commons under the requested name has uploaded four images. Courcelles 09:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: again. The requestor did not inform the target of this request. I have now done so at [1]. The target does not have an e-nail set in preferences. Courcelles 09:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: It seems user had later requested a rename at simple 4 days after this request: [2]. I'd already vacated the target name before I noticed. Marking this  Not done, suppose use could refile if they still want it. –xenotalk 18:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KoOltaseen → KoOltaseen[edit]

Status:     Not done

KoOltaseen (talk) 07:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 21 deleted edits, and 23 total edits. Requesting user has 23 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The request is filed as a rename from and to the same username, which isn't possible. I'm reading this more of a help request than an actual request for a new username, and have left a welcome menu on the user's talkpage, and watchlisted it. Courcelles 09:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 189° 47' 0" NET 12:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. –xenotalk 18:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Texbot35 → Texbob[edit]

Status:     Not done

Texbot35 (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 13 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 13 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per the attribution-required edits made by the target. Furthermore, we generally require usurpation requests to come from established accounts. Please request a different name at WP:CHUS (see special:Listusers to check if the name is taken). –xenotalk 20:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recusant5518 → Sirin[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Recusant5518 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Sirin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 19:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: No contributions registered to the user, and the account appears to be dormant. Unsure as to when the account was created, however, since it strangely has no creation log.

Recusant5518 (talk) 19:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Are you de:User:Sirin? Since they have best claim to the username. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 320° 16' 30" NET 21:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not, but their last edit was in December 2009, so the account is possibly defunct. As for whether any of the edits are GDFL significant, I'm not qualified to say. Recusant5518 (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Please re-file this request when 1) the de.wiki user has been active for at least 12 months and 2) your account has been established. –xenotalk 13:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jennavecia → Lara[edit]

Status:     Not done

Lara 17:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 38113 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Active gl.wiki user Lara (talk · contribs) currently has claim to the SUL (but hasn't unified). Perhaps you could discuss it with them and see if they mind you taking over the claim? –xenotalk 15:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • The gl.wiki user will have to agree to this rename. We can't overstep a user with 2000-odd contributions. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't speak Galician and I don't want the SUL. I just want the rename here. Is that possible? If not, am I supposed to just ask her if she cares if I have the name here or on all the projects I'm unified on or what? I don't fully understand the SUL process. Lara 05:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Bureaucrat note: She technically has first dibs on the name "Lara" for SUL, and if you take it here, she may have the right to take it away from you. If she is willing to give up the right to Lara on EnWiki, or she doesn't care about any wiki outside of glwiki, then the name could be changed, I believe. -- Avi (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Okay, well I used Google translate to write her a message. Hopefully she'll respond soon. Thanks. Lara 05:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • Still waiting. She hasn't edited yet, but I check every few days. Lara 14:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          •  Clerk note: Flagged request as on hold. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 228° 31' 15" NET 15:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • She doesn't seem to have responded yet, but perhaps you could just revert back to LaraLove? NW (Talk) 16:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
              • Oh, forget it. I'll just re-request it if she ever edits again. Lara 16:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. –xenotalk 16:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheRasIsBack → Ras[edit]

Status:     Not done

TheRasIsBack! T●C 01:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 252 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you fi:User:Ras? Since they have superior claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 194° 11' 30" NET 12:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No TheRasIsBack! T●C 00:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Far too many SUL conflicts on this one, I'm afraid. (^^^Unless you are the fi.wiki user^^^) –xenotalk 14:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I only intend to contribute to en.wiki; I thought the fi.wiki user can still make a unified login if they wish?(not 100% sure how SUL works sorry) TheRasIsBack! T●C 00:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the fi:User:Ras is now a member of the local arbcom, so you will definitely need to ask them. The rename can still go through if they're not interested in the local account here and none of the others are either. However, this is unlikely and there is a high chance that this won't be carried out. Thanks Set Sail For The Seven Seas 357° 34' 15" NET 23:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll give it a shot anyway :) TheRasIsBack! 22:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
fi:User:Ras here. I am Ras at commonswiki, fiwikibooks, fiwikinews, fiwiki (since 5th Nov 2005), enwikinews and strategywiki (of the others with edits only de.wiki's Ras seems to have recent edits) so it would make sense that I would be Ras at en.wiki too. I don't remember whether it was unavailable when I registered with this one (at 25th Nov 2005). --Makkon (talk) 23:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ok then TheRasIsBack! 00:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. –xenotalk 13:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jbtscott → Julian Scott[edit]

Status:     Not done

Julian Scott 06:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 17 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did leave a message. Please see User talk:Julian Scott. Jbtscott 12:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold, since the account was created over 2+1⁄2 years ago (03 January 2008) and has no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 220° 35' 30" NET 14:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Stop request. No need account is retired Jbtscott (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. –xenotalk 14:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William M. Connolley → Wmc[edit]

Status:     Not done

William M. Connolley (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like the account WMC (see [3] for why (I can give you the long trail of woe if you need details) and [4] for an arb supporting this).

However, account Wmc already exists. I've just put a usurp request on it [5].

Ideally, I'd like Wmc deleted, so I can create WMC. Or, if you have super-powers that can override the checks, just create WMC.

Oh, and please note: I want to keep my current account, which I intend to continue to use. I just want to use WMC as an (acknowledged) alternate.

Thanks, William M. Connolley (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 46445 undeleted edits and 832 deleted edits, for a total of 47277 edits. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify, you want to be able to use WMC (talk · contribs) as an alt, but keep William M. Connolley (talk · contribs) intact with the edits? –xenotalk 18:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks. Also, I don't intend to use WMC on commons. Should I notify the commons Wmc? William M. Connolley (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not necessary. I think they are the ja.wiki user. –xenotalk 19:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that there is an active commons user named Wmc (talk · contribs), who has claim to the SUL. Taking WMC (talk · contribs) is not out of the question, but note, for consideration, this recent discussion on usernames that differ in case only. I'd guess that requestor only intends to use "WMC" for editing here, and the commons user doesn't appear to edit here, so I guess this would not be too much of an issue. (Not to mention that the "WMC" acronym is already commonly used to refer to the requestor.) –xenotalk 18:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The request as filed is  Not done because commons user has claim to the title-case SUL, but I've checkY created the uppercase WMC account and emailed the password (potential for confusion is nil here). –xenotalk 18:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LUU → Lubosky[edit]

Status:     Not done

LUU (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Lubosky" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Just create the account with the correct name. –xenotalk 14:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PalletBot → Pallet[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: PalletBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Pallet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 14:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: To remove "bot" from the username, since this account will be used by a bot platform not a bot so having "bot" in the username will cause confusion. The edit summary will show edits was done by a bot, so it will be within the bot policy. I will answer any questions from my main account, d'oh!.

PalletBot (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain further? What is the difference between a bot platform and a bot? Bot-flagged edits done by an account without "bot" in the name will be even more confusing, imo. –xenotalk 14:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pallet is just a platform that provide a connection to Wikipedia, the magic comes from a editors coding a job to do edits to Wikipedia running on the platform. I want to avoid calling the platform a bot and instead call the jobs coded by editors a bot, to make editors aware that they are coding bots and need to make sure they follow the same polices other bots go through. The edit summery will have the name of the bot running and a link to its discussion page. If the jobs done on the platform are called bots and the platform called has "bot" in the username it makes it harder to explain what is going on. I hope that makes some sense. d'oh! talk 15:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What about "Pallet Bot Platform" or something similar? "Pallet" could just be any old editor. –xenotalk 15:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since the edit summery and the user page will show that this is a bot platform running a bot. I didn't believe a lengthy username was needed and with a edit summery being lengthy already (with bot and edit info) I didn't want to take up anymore room in user's wishlist and page's history. d'oh! talk 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PalletPlatform? :D Benner9 (talk) 09:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If we perform the rename, there is no guarantee that BAG won't just send you right back here to get it changed to something more suitable. Per Wikipedia:BOTPOL#Bot accounts, "it should be immediately clear that its edits are made by an automated account; this is usually accomplished by including the word 'Bot' at the beginning or end of the username". Yes, a descriptive edit summary and a bot flag will, in most cases, make it clear; but in other cases (such as a raw list of contributors to an article), it would not be clear. Would suggest you get clearance from BAG first with respect to the name avoid having to flip-flop back and forth. –xenotalk 13:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With the concerns raised here and the discussion at BAG, I like to withdraw the request. Thanks. d'oh! talk 06:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. –xenotalk 03:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harrypotter2062 → TARGET NAME[edit]

Status:     Not done

Harrypotter2062 (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Target Name : Replacing Harrypotter2062

reason  : Am not using so would be better if some one wants to use it

Link  : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

 Clerk note: The requested username "TARGET NAME" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done If you want to change your username, choose one and file at WP:CHUS. –xenotalk 14:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gbarcley → Barfoot & Thompson[edit]

Status:     Not done

Gbarcley (talk) 01:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Barfoot & Thompson" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done - usernames cannot be that of an organization. –xenotalk 14:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deneyes → TARGET NAME[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Deneyes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Please fill out this template correctly, replacing TARGET NAME with your Target username. (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 10:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Deneyes (talk) 10:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Pigmydmm[reply]

  • I'm not sure, but I'm guessing you want to be renamed to 'Pigmydmm'? This account is not registered, so there is no need to usurp it. Since you have made no edits other than this one, there is no need to change usernames either, you can just register the new account with the name you want.  Not done –xenotalk 12:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aallen1995 → Adam[edit]

Status:     Not done

Adam (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 3 undeleted edits and -3 deleted edits, for a total of 0 edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1032 undeleted edits and 2 deleted edits, for a total of 1034 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 1034 total edits on 4 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but the name "Adam" is already in use on many Wikimedia projects [6]. Because we are unifying user names across Wikimedia projects, I cannot you this name here - the user with the best claim to the name across all projects edits the Polish language Wiktionary (he is an administrator there with 23k+ edits). WJBscribe (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Namchin d → Namchin[edit]

Status:     Not done

Namchin d (talk) 04:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1 edit. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 1 total edit on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Usurp request are typically granted to established users with a history of editing. Please re-request when you meet this requirement. –xenotalk 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WETKEYS123 → WETKEYS[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: WETKEYS123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: WETKEYS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 21:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: The name WETKEYS is trademarked and copyrighted under WETKEYS LLC. I was unable to create this username because it was "too similar".

The same thing happened on YouTube where the username was already taken and it was changed due to copyright protection. Please change this username to WETKEYS. If you need any verification let me know and I will provide this. WETKEYS123 (talk) 21:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "WETKEYS" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by the username policy. Please choose another name. –xenotalk 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done –xenotalk 17:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noerrmarketing → Pomaikai[edit]

Status:     In progress

Noerrmarketing (talk) 06:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Reason: Mistakable name. I'd like to be registered in correspondance with the guidelines.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 4 undeleted edits and 4 deleted edits, for a total of 8 edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 4 undeleted edits and 1 deleted edit, for a total of 5 edits. An SUL account (primary dewiki) exists for the requesting user, with 14 total edits on 2 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • In general, we tend to only grant usurp requests to accounts that have been established for several months and have made significant edits. At present, you do not meet these criteria. Do feel free to create a new account with an unused name and re-file for this name when you meet the requirements. N.B. If you are renamed on your home wiki, this request would be granted. –xenotalk 14:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done – Per Xeno. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stemcellbaby → Fatcud[edit]

Status:     Not done

Stemcellbaby (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • This user is currently blocked by Beeblebrox for Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: Block evasion
  • Target user has 20 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 20 total edits on 5 wikis. Requesting user has 11 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 11 total edits on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You do realise that by being User:Fatcud and creating User:Stemcellbaby while being blocked as User:Fatcud is a blockable offence? By the looks of things, you're also User:Iranian86Footballer. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 230° 36' 0" NET 15:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Absent behavioural evidence, probably best to file an SPI to investigate the veracity of this assumption. –xenotalk 13:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I was going by the reason they gave, "This is my username on other sites" and the fact that User:Fatcud is global. Therefore, if User:Stemcellbaby is User:Fatcud on other wikis, then they are also User:Fatcud here. However, "other sites" may not refer to other wikis. In that case, the usurpation should be fine. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 208° 6' 45" NET 13:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I read that as 'other [non-Wikimedia] sites'. –xenotalk 13:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! I think I will assume good faith on this one! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 293° 9' 0" NET 19:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you were right =]. –xenotalk 04:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done, requesting user blocked as sock. –xenotalk 04:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Dough's Pizza → Ckesten[edit]

Status:     Not done

Crazy Dough's Pizza (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 2 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1 edit. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 1 total edit on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be ideal if you would chose a name that was not taken. –xenotalk 14:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Usurp requests are typically granted to established accounts that are several months old. Feel free to re-request when you meet that requirement. Please create a new account with an untaken name and do not use a business name. Thank you, –xenotalk 12:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HWV258 → Handel[edit]

Status:     Not done

 HWV258.  04:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 61 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 2769 undeleted edits and 6 deleted edits, for a total of 2775 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 2799 total edits on 10 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Target user has GFDL/cc-by-sa significant edits. –xenotalk 12:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radres → NasaRadres[edit]

Status:     Not done

Radres (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reason: I have the target account in the turkish wiki. I created the current account prior to the one in the Tr wiki, but the name was already taken there. I want to maintain a consistent identity throughout Wiki.
  •  Bureaucrat note: Verification requested. Please log in to your home wiki and make an edit at your talk page certifying this request. –xenotalk 14:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, wouldn't it be easier to simply usurp Radres at tr.wiki? –xenotalk 15:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • Target user has 3 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary trwiki) exists for the target user, with 32 total edits on 7 wikis. Requesting user has 19 edits. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Note: Placed on hold; user is trying to usurp Radres at their local wiki instead. –xenotalk 13:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Requesting user has been renamed at their home wiki, so I assume this request is withdrawn. –xenotalk 13:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stemcellbaby2 → Fatcud[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Stemcellbaby2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Fatcud (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 17:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: I requested an usurpation of this username as 'Stemcellbaby' - however I was blocked as Stemcellbaby for 'Block evasion'. Bizarrely I have not been given the opportunity to appeal this block, and I don't know why I have been blocked as I hadn't made any disruptive edits. I have left a message on Amalthea's talk page but they have not got back to me. I apologize for the long 'reason', however I wish to continue with the usurpation as Stemcellbaby2 if possible.

Stemcellbaby2 (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • This user is currently blocked by Beeblebrox for Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: Block evasion
  • Target user has 20 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 20 total edits on 5 wikis. Requesting user has 2 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 2 total edits on 3 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done requesting user blocked. –xenotalk 13:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Namchin d → Namchin[edit]

Status:     Not done

Namchin d (talk) 09:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 3 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 3 total edits on 5 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doctoroctopussy → Doctorawesomeness[edit]

Status:     Not done

 Clerk note: The requested username "Doctorawesomeness" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; done at CHU. –xenotalk 14:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Masaa.m → Masaa[edit]

Status:     Not done

Masaa.m (talk) 08:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (arwiki), this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary arwiki) exists for the target user, with 9 total edits on 2 wikis. 4 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 9 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. Requesting user has 2 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 2 total edits on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you ar:User:Masaa? Since they have best claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 254° 51' 0" NET 16:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: Verification requested. Please log in to your home wiki and make an edit at your talk page certifying this request. –xenotalk 13:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; no response. –xenotalk 14:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Jim Davis[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Target username: Jim Davis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user
  • Datestamp: 21:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC) I do not hold the SUL for Jim Davis, there is none.
  • Reason: I think I am he, but I cannot log in as him anymore. My contributions (other than 2 at Wikipedia:Help_desk) seem to be gone and my User page is gone without a deletion that I can see, but I cannot create an account in that name. Is this the correct vehicle to attempt to reclaim the account? I shall monitor this topic for response.
  • Note: This request has been detected as an usurp only request.

216.75.233.50 (talk) 21:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 2 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). AnomieBOT⚡ 21:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You'll need to create a temporary account to receive the name. –xenotalk 17:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; no response. Feel free to re-file. –xenotalk 15:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ModernGeek → Preston[edit]

Status:     Not done

ModernGeek (talk) 20:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 84 undeleted edits and 7 deleted edits, for a total of 91 edits. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you sw:User:Preston? Since they have the best claim to the SUL account. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 2° 46' 45" NET 00:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; no response. Would consider this again after 17 Dec 2010 when sv user will have been inactive for 1 year, but right now they have claim. –xenotalk 15:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aleemshah → Jigsaw4u[edit]

Status:     Not done

Jigsaw4u 20:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1 edit. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 1 total edit on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Please re-request in a few months after your account has been established. –xenotalk 15:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

원용 → DS1SKU[edit]

Status:     Not done

원용 (talk) 11:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 2 total edits on 3 wikis. Requesting user has 5 undeleted edits and 5 deleted edits, for a total of 10 edits. An SUL account (primary kowiki) exists for the requesting user, with 5090 total edits on 21 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Did you register the account? Please log in and post here to certify this request and I can swap the names. –xenotalk 14:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How to certify? I am DS1SKU. :( -- 원용 (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IN KOREAN WIKIPEDIA, I am a Senior Editor and my ham callsign is DS1SKU. I request same to kowiki. -- 원용 (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't make DS1SKU account. Check IP and block him. and give me DS1SKU account. -- 원용 (talk) 21:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That would not be appropriate per our local policy. It seems the account was created the same day you filed the usurp request - I don't know if there's some underlying impersonation issue or something? If you are able to get renamed at your local wiki, and able to usurp the global account, this request will proceed. Otherwise, we can't usurp a newly-created account that holds the SUL. –xenotalk 15:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not same day.[7] I request rename to my callsign, and later, somebody make it at kowiki and enwiki. Find IP and block him. he will act as me. -- 원용 (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a global issue, not something that en.wiki bureaucrats have jurisdiction over. I posted to m:SR/SUL#DS1SKU for advice. –xenotalk 14:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please see [8], where a steward wrote -

I'm not aware of a policy that would allow us to usurp an account based on its status as matching a callsign. Further, this diff on ko.wikipedia seems to indicate that the username was not selected as an impersonation, but user initials and the initials of his university/universities. If the existing accounts are usurped by the requesting user (원용), however, it would make sense to have stewards delete the global account to permit reunification. It would be best to explain the situation calmly to the current user of the "DS1SKU" account, however, and ask them to voluntarily relinquish it first. (If it matters, I understand my username has previously been the callsign of a Western United States radio station. Not that I was aware of this fact prior to my Wikipedia involvement.) Kylu 17:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please feel free to refile this request if they volunteer to relinquish the username. For now, I am marking  Not done –xenotalk 05:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Theudobod[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Target username: Theudobod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user
  • Datestamp: 18:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)You have not added a confirmation link! Replace this message with the url that confirms that you hold the SUL for Theudobod.
  • Reason: Request made for account but problem with receiving email for verification encountered
  • Note: This request has been detected as an usurp only request.

91.214.168.197 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Theudobod" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you are having trouble creating an account, please use the account creation interface provided via the toolserver. –xenotalk 04:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done (nothing to do). –xenotalk 04:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Green Arrow D4 → Green Arrow[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Green Arrow D4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Green Arrow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 12:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: I wanted to create my user name like this. But i saw that it was already taken on en.wikipedia. But i found that the user has not done any edits for about 5 years now. So i am requesting a name change.

Green Arrow D4 (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 6 undeleted edits and 3 deleted edits, for a total of 9 edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 5 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 5 total edits on 2 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User appears to have some significant edits on Wikipedia.  JoeGazz  ▲  13:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done - please re-file this request after you have established your user account in terms of number of edits and time elapsed since registration. –xenotalk 04:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MKSoldier → Moneeb Ahmed[edit]

Status:     Not done

MKSoldier (talk) 13:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Moneeb Ahmed" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per above. See the relevant advice at WP:REALNAME and re-file at WP:CHUS if you still want to proceed. –xenotalk 04:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy131713 → Tnseke45675467[edit]

Status:     Not done

[[User:Daisy131713 talk) 07:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please file this at WP:CHUS, or alternatively, simply create a new account with the desired name. –xenotalk 15:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The requested username "Tnseke45675467" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Yenopd465[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Target username: Yenopd465 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user
  • Datestamp: 14:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This request has been detected as an usurp only request.

76.67.16.200 (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Yenopd465" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done - nothing to do here. Use special:CreateAccount if you want to create an account. –xenotalk 16:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andcir → Anialm[edit]

Status:     Not done

Andcir (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Anialm" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY Performed rename, usurp  Not done because nothing to usurp. –xenotalk 18:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taqi Haider → Elminster[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Taqi Haider (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Elminster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 15:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: My current account is the same as my real name, I usually use an alias on online registrations therefore I want to change my user name, this particular user name was chosen only because I am reading the elminster series.

Taqi Haider (talk) 15:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 96 undeleted edits and 4 deleted edits, for a total of 100 edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1516 undeleted edits and 552 deleted edits, for a total of 2068 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 2071 total edits on 19 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hm, the target user has significant contributions. Could you perhaps select a different name, one that is not taken, or one that was not used by someone who made edits? –xenotalk 21:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • okay, lets settle for Elminster Aumar. Taqi Haider (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • checkY renamed as requested, the usurp itself was  Not done. –xenotalk 13:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subin sebastien → Subinsebastien[edit]

Status:     Not done

Subin sebastien (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Subinsebastien" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done nothing to usurp; checkY rename done as requested. –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ron ner2000 → History and technology[edit]

Status:     Not done

Ron ner2000 (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "History and technology" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have multiple requests, which one should I process? –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done please re-file as a single request, as I'm not sure which one you want processed. –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ron ner2000 → Big boy12[edit]

Status:     Not done

Ron ner2000 (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "Big boy12" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have multiple requests, which one should I process? –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done please re-file as a single request, as I'm not sure which one you want processed. –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ron ner2000 → History and technology[edit]

Status:     Not done

Ron ner2000 (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 0 total edits on 1 wiki. Requesting user has 7 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 8 total edits on 4 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have multiple requests, which one should I process? –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done please re-file as a single request, as I'm not sure which one you want processed. –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HASSAM PATOLI → RAZA MOHSINI[edit]

Status:     Not done

HASSAM PATOLI (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "RAZA MOHSINI" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; you've filed two requests, I'm not sure which you prefer. Please choose one and file at WP:CHUS because the neither target exists and thus usurp is not required. –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HASSAM PATOLI → RAZAMOHSIN[edit]

Status:     Not done

HASSAM PATOLI (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "RAZAMOHSIN" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; you've filed two requests, I'm not sure which you prefer. Please choose one and file at WP:CHUS because the neither target exists and thus usurp is not required. –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → EJKorvette[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Target username: EJKorvette (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user
  • Datestamp: 23:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This request has been detected as an usurp only request.

174.48.163.139 (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The requested username "EJKorvette" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; nothing to do. If you want to register an account please use special:CreateAccount (if that is causing you trouble, for too similar name, etc., then you can use the WP:ACC interface). –xenotalk 14:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mirakelman → Boris Breuer[edit]

Status:     Not done

Mirakelman (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary commonswiki) exists for the target user, with 0 total edits on 4 wikis. Requesting user has 2 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 2 total edits on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you post from the second username verifying you own it? –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done; no response. And you can simply abandon the first account and start using the second. –xenotalk 14:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ingber → Ingber[edit]

Status:     Not done

Lester Ingber 21:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

On http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MergeAccount&action=submit I keep seeing: Login unification not complete! From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia No accounts could be confirmed using this password. Once your login is unified, you will be able to log in to any wiki site of the Wikimedia Foundation without creating a new account Read more about unified login… The accounts named "Ingber" on each of the following sites have been automatically attached to the unified account: en.wikipedia.org meta.wikimedia.org The account "Ingber" could not be automatically confirmed as belonging to you on the following sites; most likely they have a different password from your primary account: sv.wikipedia.org

I think I got the idea: I must contact a Bureaucrat associated with sv.wikipedia.org, and I see some listed on: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Anv%C3%A4ndare/bureaucrat

I think I am eligible to apply to "ursurp" Ingber, since on http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Ingber I see: Users with name Ingber on Wikimedia projects SUL account status Username: Ingber User ID: 4039075 User registration: 14:42, 02 September 2009 Home wiki: enwiki Locked: no Hidden: no SUL admin (secure) • Contributions Database Project Editcount Registration date Flags Blocked SUL status enwiki(c) wikipedia 18 16:58, 26 March 2006 No home wiki metawiki(c) wikimedia 1 21:58, 14 March 2010 No autocreated svwiki(c) wikipedia 0 09:04, 31 October 2008 No unattached Home wiki: enwiki_p


The form which I think is appropriate is formidable enough, but it is in Swedish, and I haven't got a chance of doing anything?

NOTE: I tried to do this back in March 2010, and I submitted a form, but got no reply.

Can anyone at Wikipedia file this for me?

Thanks.

Lester

Lester Ingber 21:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk note: The target username "Ingber" is equivalent to the original username "Ingber". Please follow the instructions at the top of the page to correctly file your request. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:07, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parasect → Pikachu[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Parasect (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Pikachu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 22:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: I realized that I like Pikachu better than Parasect, I would appreciate it if I was renamed. Thanks.

Parasect (Discuss) 22:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC) --Parasect (Discuss) 22:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1680 undeleted edits and 30 deleted edits, for a total of 1710 edits. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You were renamed in July of this year and again in October. The purpose of usernames is to identify contributors and enhance collaboration. This purpose is hindered if you change your username every few months. –xenotalk 23:11, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above and the fact that de.wiki user Pikachu is active and will soon lay claim to the SUL for this name (claim currently held by inactive pl. user, there are also many other accounts on other projects with this name). –xenotalk 23:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Max Terry → Maxwell[edit]

Status:     Not done

Maxwell Terry (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 303 undeleted edits and 8 deleted edits, for a total of 311 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 311 total edits on 7 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hm, the ru. user is active and has claim to this name, did you have another one in mind? –xenotalk 13:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done per above. Please re-file. –xenotalk 03:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asdafgysd → Fatcud[edit]

Status:     Not done

  • Current username: Asdafgysd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
  • Target username: Fatcud (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
  • Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
  • For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
  • Datestamp: 13:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Reason: Hello. I want to usurp this user. I notice there are already an usurpation request on this user. And they are blocked so I don't want to make a problem, however I would like this thankyou.

Fatima talk 13:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • This user is currently blocked by Beeblebrox for Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: Block evasion
  • Target user has 20 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 20 total edits on 5 wikis. Requesting user has 156 edits. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done The requesting user appears to be the target user. Please seek unblocking from your main account via the usual means or contact WP:BASC. –xenotalk 03:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jrdan → Jordan[edit]

Status:     Not done

Jrdan (talk) 06:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, I wish to claim this name please as it is my forename and preferable to any other. My understanding is that the account has been blocked and inactive for almost four years and I would very much appretiate the opportunity to put it to good use. Thank you.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user is currently blocked by Martinp23 for VoA
  • Target user has 4 undeleted edits and 9 deleted edits, for a total of 13 edits. An SUL account (primary simplewiki) exists for the target user, with 460 total edits on 1 wiki. 37 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 235 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. Requesting user has 12 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 12 total edits on 12 wikis. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Sorry, the SUL for this name is owned by simple:user:Jordan. They appear to be inactive since 2008, so you might see over there if there is some way to usurp it and if so, have a steward delete the global account (m:SR/SUL). However, you would still then need to clear it the other project users who are actively using the name as well - so probably best just to choose a different name. –xenotalk 03:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick response and explanation Xeno, I wasn't aware of the different sign-ins for the Wiki network at the time of my post. I'll look at this further now I understand more with the advice you have provided. Thank you for your time. Jrdan (talk) 04:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations/Rejected/12

Leave a Reply