Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
< February 18
February 20 >

February 19[edit]

Category:Hangu District[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate of Category:Hangu District, Pakistan Robby (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gabriel Johnston[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category has three pages it in. The subject and two things that were named after them. (both the county and the fort link back to Gabriel Johnston). This category is not helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soundtracks from Enchanted (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems to be a WP:NARROWCAT with no current room for expansion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Japanese false documents[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_5#Category:Korean_false_documents; unclear if this is for the country of Japan or the Japanese language. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Downtown Columbus, Ohio[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 27#Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Downtown Columbus, Ohio

Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 27#Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment

Category:Museums established in 1596[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Clean up following this and this and few other discussions. WP:OCYEAR / WP:NARROWCAT –Aidan721 (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Books by Indian authors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Indian books by writer and purge as suggested by Marcocapelle. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category Mason (talk) 01:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The category hierarchy is very confusing but these aren't really overlapping categories. e.g. Quichotte (novel) is a book by an Indian (origin) author but isn't an Indian book. I believe this would be the case for books by many authors of Indian origin. I think a restructuring of the category hierarchy is more in order than merging these two categories. —SpacemanSpiff 03:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... well, either way the category would need to be renamed to make that clearer. So something like Books by writers of Indian descent? Then the question becomes whether that should be category? Mason (talk) 04:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree on the category name. I believe the category tree needs a relook to sort out the hierarchy and nomenclature. I'm not sure how to go about it, especially since many authors would be affected -- Naipaul, Rushdie, J Lahiri, V Seth etc where their books would fit in one or a few times, both. —SpacemanSpiff 05:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is confusing indeed. Merge as nominated and purge if it concerns books by authors who had migrated to another country. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Marcocapelle; seems more defining. Qwerfjkltalk 21:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fiction about terrestrial planets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary WP:NARROWCAT distinction. There's simply not enough in Category:Fiction about planets to justify subcategorizing it in this manner. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom; be sure that category contents are not in another subcategory before merging. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alt-right politicians in the United Kingdom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename/populate/reparent as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, or rename, re-parent and populate, "alt-right" is not a defining characteristic of these politicians. After the rename, several far-right politicians by nationality subcategories can be added to Category:Far-right politicians in Europe. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Although the term alt right has become popular in the U.S., there is not really a need to rename what is, in fact, the rightmost part of the political spectrum. Place Clichy (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support per nom and place clichy Mason (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged Category:Alt-right politicians in Europe and Category:Alt-right politicians in Oceania.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Iraqi revolt of 1920[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Iraqi Revolt has been moved no fewer than 13 times, so its title is not exactly uncontroversial as required by C2D. The last RM at the talk page resulted in no consensus (neither then-current title nor the proposed title at said RM were the now-current title); nom is advised to open an RM in the hopes of consensus. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per Iraqi Revolt. Charles Essie (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 12:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:FIBA Europe Championship navigational boxes[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 27#Category:FIBA Europe Championship navigational boxes


Category:Human-derived fictional species[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category's title is vague and it is unclear what is defining about being derived from humans. Races can look totally human without actually being derived from them whatsoever, races can also look completely inhuman while still being derived from humans, meaning that it is essentially just a minor lore point with no bearing on the race itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Their status as human descendants is not a minor point. Dimadick (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that you believed its about human descendants when it's actually not is further evidence that it's too vague to be a category.
    While it could be renamed to "Fictional human descendants", it would then rule out most of the articles in the category, most of which are of supernatural or artificial origin. It would only include the Eloi and Morlocks. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger, instead rename to Category:Fictional human-descended species. AHI-3000 (talk) 04:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • For example Abhuman is a term used to distinguish a separation from normal human existence. This has nothing to do with descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Category contents are a mess, with no clear distinction between possible redefinitions. Some contents, such as the Azi, can belong under Category:Fictional transhumans. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. There might be wisdom in creating something like Category:Fictional human-descended species, but the current category is not that. Renaming would entail puring most of the category, which seems like more work than just starting from scratch. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Births circa 1580[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:16th-century births and Category:Year of birth uncertain. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duel merge. Although I agree that the decades don't help bubble situations like this,, the category isn't defining Mason (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Substack writers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: selective merge to Category:Bloggers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Writing for Substack does not seem to be a defining characteristic for any of the people in this category, per WP:COPDEF, WP:DEFINING, WP:CATDEF, WP:BLPCAT, but rather an incidental aspect. The barrier to being a Substack writer appears nil. While some people might be notable as bloggers (Category:Bloggers) regardless of platform, or consistently associated with a certain publication (e.g. Category:The New York Times writers), we don't generally categorize people who just happen to have a particular blog or social media account (e.g. no Category:Tumblr posters or Category:Facebook users or Category:Blogspot.com writers). While having a Substack profile may be verifiable, verifiability is not the same as 'definingness', per WP:NONDEFINING --Animalparty! (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle, but these should be selectively merged to bloggers, because that's effectively what they are. Mason (talk) 04:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or manually merge) per nom. I checked a number of articles, and did not get the impression that a manual merge is needed. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The recent Atlantic article by Jonathan M. Katz on the politics of Substack writers caused me to review some of the writers and this category is informative.Kmccook (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It may be fine to include this information in the Substack article but it does not require a category. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Katz found unspecified "scores" (at least 16!) of writers publishing white-supremacist and/or Nazi content, out of over 17,000 paid writers on Substack (less than 1 percent), and calls it a Nazi problem. Good for him. That doesn't mean Katz, nor anyone else warrants placement in this category, per the above guideline, as well as WP:NOTEVERYTHING. We don't include data or categories merely because it's true or because some might find it useful or interesting. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and trim (creator). At least some of the people in this category are defined by their writing on Substack, or at least are primarily known for their work as Substack writers. Matthew Yglesias and Noah Smith (writer) are two examples whose work I read from time to time, and they fully dedicate their time to Substack blogging. feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    But are they commonly described as Stubstack writers? Why is this different from blogging? Mason (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selective merge to Category:Bloggers per nominator's rationale. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 01:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Selective merge to Category:Bloggers. Substack writers are effectively bloggers and it would not be useful to categorize online writer by platform.--User:Namiba 17:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Entertainment events in Massachusetts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: implement Aidan721's proposal. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category is the only one of its kind and seems redundant with its subcategories. User:Namiba 16:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I am adding the Boston subcategory to the nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support per nom and marco. Mason (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and suggest the following. First, if these are to be deemed not needed, they need to be merged not deleted. Instead:

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • If someone volunteers for building out a by state tree then I am ok with that too. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Since 12 February nobody stood up to volunteer, so that is apparently not the way to go forward. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Marcocapelle: I assumed me suggesting it volunteered myself to build out the hierarchy. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Alright, thanks, then I'll strike my comment of just now. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Major League Baseball books[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 27#Category:Major League Baseball books

Category:Lists of groups[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Merging is not needed, the subcategory already is under Category:Groups of people and Category:Lists of people. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I could have sworn that there was other stuff in this category when I made it, but there doesn't seem to be anymore, so I guess delete is ok.★Trekker (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I thought at first this was about Category:Group theory, but I guess this is a stub. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nazis executed by the United States military by electric chair[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Mason (talk) 04:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, this nomination can probably merged into the nomination below. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nazis executed by Nazi Germany by guillotine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Do we really need this level of granularity for the intersection between Nazi & execution method & country of execution? Mason (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kamana Film Awards Winners[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Winning this award is not defining to those who have won it. The accomplishment is not even mentioned most of the articles and just listed in an awards table in others. I don't think we categorize by every award someone has won. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rock songs in 2023[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Songs aren't categorized by both year and genre. Categorization should follow the instructions as per WP:SONGS#Categories. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Danish craftsmen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category. Mason (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or delete, I am not sure if bakers count as artisans. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Suspicious death[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category with a vague definition. In theory, this category could be slipt to Causes of death and Unsolved deaths, but all three pages are already properly categorized. Mason (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, all three articles already are in the Unsolved tree. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Grouping[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual rename to Category:Types of groupings. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I am worried that this category falls under WP:SHAREDNAME, with numerous unrelated categories that simply have the word "group". A move to Category:Groups could fix the issues, but it also may not. Either way, something should probably be done to address the issue. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_19

Leave a Reply