Cannabis Ruderalis

November 3[edit]

Category:Combat sports families by country[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Combat sports families. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only three child categories, that could arguably also be upmerged Mason (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports families of the Soviet Union and Russia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Russian families. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 18:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename as the only category in it is for russian families Mason (talk) 22:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Marine fish of Northern Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, these are Indo-Pacific fish, not at all specifically occurring within the Australian borders. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. HouseBlastertalk 18:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated former national legislators[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I'm pretty sure that we don't distinguish by "former" for legislators Mason (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was pretty much my rationale until my categorization was reverted by User:Adavidb and User:331dot who indicated James A. Garfield was not a state legislator when he was assassinated. I created the category to address their concerns which apparently did. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that in this case the issue is that the assassination isn't defining unless they were assassinated for being a "former" legislator. But I'd love to hear other people's thoughts on what do to. Mason (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, do not merge. Even if these people were assassinated for political reasons, it does not seem in a majority of cases to be linked to having formerly held legislative office or local council membership. Assassinated politicians may be the best way to describe them, except when there's already a better way to define them such as assassinated presidents. The fact that Reinhard Heydrich or Abraham Lincoln had been, at some point in their life, members of the Prussian Landtag or the Illinois State Legislature is pretty remote from the circumstances of their death. In the rare but not impossible case that someone was assassinated, for something they did as legislator, after they had left office, and that the consensus of reliable sources agree upon this link, then they belong in Assassinated (sub)national legislators because that is defining for them. I appreciate the creator for taking bold initiatives, but this is really a trivial intersection. Place Clichy (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment. In the case "they belong in Assassinated (sub)national legislators [...]", I have to point out that it could also be the case that the motives of the assassin are unknown and the murdered person held several public offices. Even if the person is killed being an incumbent and the motive is not known, it could only be speculated that the motive was the incumbent position, when the person could have had a grudge stemming when the politician held a previous office.
    Also, without having a specific example in mind, there could be cases where the politician assassinated is incumbent in one office but was killed for situations stemming from their previous office. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    In the case that the motives of the assassin are unknown and the murdered person held several public offices, then the correct category is assassinated politicians without mentioning any office. Place Clichy (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That's what I was thinking. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Place Clichy. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British Hong Kong singers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge both as proposed. Marcocapelle, Danny Chan is the only article (currently) in Category:British Hong Kong singers; in my capacity as an individual editor, I intend place it in Category:20th-century Hong Kong singers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 18:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I don't think that the intersection between regime is defining for entertainers Mason (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canadian expatriate film directors in the United States[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Canadian expatriate film directors in the United States

Category:Baltic Finnic people[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Baltic Finnic people

Category:Indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East

Category:Pharmacists from the Russian Empire[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Pharmacists from the Russian Empire

Category:Fictional LGBT characters by gender or sex[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Fictional LGBT characters by gender or sex

Category:Blockades involving the United Kingdom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename "involved" -> "by". (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 17:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These categories are for blockades (partially or entirely) enforced by the US/ UK, not other blockades that the US/UK was involved in, either as a target or external supporter or opponent of the blockade. (t · c) buidhe 20:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Museums in Maine by populated place[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Museums in Maine by populated place

Category:People of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:People of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war

Category:Writing systems derived from the Chinese[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename, no consensus to merge (see also the discussion below this one). The merger can be proposed seprately in a new CfD if it is still desired, but the two discussions here are too muddled to form a consensus for that. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Awkward category name Remsense 18:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update Incorporating Folly Mox's suggestion, I'm currently in favor of merging this and Category:Chinese scripts into Category:Writing systems using Chinese characters. Remsense 17:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See below discussion about related category.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scatterbrained ramble I'm not sure exactly what kind of merger is now being proposed. Is it renaming this category to Category:Writing systems derived from Chinese characters, and then reparenting it and Category:Chinese scripts into a new supercat Category:Writing systems using Chinese characters?
I'm not really a CFD person so I'm not sure if the distinction is one we should keep or not, but we do currently distinguish between writing systems that use a familiar and relatively circumscribed set of genetically related logograms, and writing systems that use some combination of those logograms and orthographic derivations. Category:Chinese scripts holds most of the first type, and also some outliers like List of Chinese–Japanese false friends (which probably just belongs in Category:Chinese characters). Category:Writing systems derived from the Chinese holds the second list item from two sentences ago.
As a confounding element, some of the articles in each category have to do with the written expression of Chinese languages (Bopomofo, Cantonese Bopomofo, and Nüshu here; Sichuanese characters, Singapore Chinese characters, Written Cantonese, and Written Chinese at the other category): all the rest talk about languages other than Chinese.
I suppose the main problem really is that we don't have a culturally neutral term for 字 the way we have the word letter for alphabetical writing system glyphs genetically derived from the Phoenician. Otherwise we could do away with the whole confounding "Chinese" descriptor.
I don't know that I'm proposing anything here, so I've bolded a thing at the top of this comment so the closer doesn't have to read it. Folly Mox (talk) 00:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chinese scripts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename as nominated, no consensus to merge (see also the discussion above this one). * Pppery * it has begun... 02:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 'script' is a particularly ambiguous term here, the purely stylistic sense of 'script' has another category Remsense 18:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update Incorporating Folly Mox's suggestion, I'm currently in favor of merging this and Category:Writing systems derived from the Chinese into Category:Writing systems using Chinese characters. Remsense 17:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't think I suggested anything for this one: I just agreed with your proposed rename title.
But I'm not sure I'm 100% sold on merging those two categories. I think it's worthwhile to continue to distinguish between Chinese characters and written figures derived therefrom. Maybe Category:Writing systems using Chinese characters for this one, and Category:Writing systems using Chinese character derivatives for the other? Or Category:Writing systems using modified Chinese characters for the other? I'm not entirely opposed to a catmerge either, for clarity, but it does seem a little imprecise if we're going to be using the term "Chinese characters" when talking about e.g. Bopomofo. Apologies if this isn't what you meant. Folly Mox (talk) 00:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've now gone back to them being separate categories, hmm. Category:Writing systems using Chinese characters and Category:Writing systems derived from Chinese characters maybe? Remsense 00:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Writers by Occitan dialect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/keep as per Place Clichy's alt proposal. Specifically:
Nominator's rationale: merge per. Gascon dialect and Provençal dialect are just dialects of the Occitan language and we do not usually categorize writers by dialect. This is follow-up on this pending discussion, pinging User:Place Clichy and User:Iketsi contributors to this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Provençal and Gascon, merge Category:Occitan-language Occitan writers as uselessly redundant. The issue here is that for a very long time (from the Middle Ages to the mid-20th century), this language was called either provençal, gascon or other regional names like auvergnat, until the consensus was widely accepted that it was a unique language, and the archaic word occitan chosen for it. So... it is in fact defining from some writers to have written in provençal etc. because that's how reliable sources would describe them (and probably themselves and their contemporaries too). The third category is nonsensical though. Following the closure of this CfD, I lastly suggest to merge Category:Occitan writers into Category:Occitan-language writers. Place Clichy (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Open-source software converted to a proprietary license[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 23#Category:Open-source software converted to a proprietary license

Category:History of the Chinese script[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Chinese script style. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 22:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Remsense 21:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update. My proposition is now to just upmerge with Category:History of the Chinese language. Remsense 00:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alopoglossidae stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Lizard stubs. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 22:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Stub category with less than 50 pages, upmerge to Category:Lizard stubs. Andumé (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Creator's rationale: I do understand that 60 articles is the standard threshold; I created this as a way to help decrease the size of the overlarge Lizard stubs category. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per convention. There are currently only 33 stubs in the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anguidae stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Lizard stubs. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 22:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Stub category with less than 50 pages, upmerge to Category:Lizard stubs. Andumé (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Creator's rationale: I do understand that 60 articles is the standard threshold; I created this as a way to help decrease the size of the overlarge Lizard stubs category. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per convention. There are currently only 47 stubs in the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, but should the template be deleted or just redirected? Edward-Woodrow (talk) 15:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Afghan women cricketers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Afghan women cricketers

Category:Naturalised subjects of the Kingdom of Great Britain[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Naturalised subjects of the Kingdom of Great Britain

Category:National Arts Club[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category contains a single article and a subcategory. The article is Abbott Fuller Graves who was a member of the National Arts Club. I don't think being a member is a defining characteristic so I propose removing Abbott Fuller Graves from Category:National Arts Club and deleting the category, keeping only the subcategory Category:National Arts Club Medal of Honor Recipients. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The category is a stub as other categories, like notable members and Art collection in the National Arts Club will be added over time. I'm still doing the research to create the categories, which is why I created a master structure on it. But if 3 sub-categories is not enough to warrant a top level category, then I would be OK with deletion (I created the top category) TNL (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, just membership is hardly ever a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Turning Red characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Near duplicate of Category:Turning Red character redirects to lists. Unneeded. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lightyear (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now, without prejudice against recreation if it can be appropriately populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A category that would likely always be WP:SMALLCAT. I could only see 3 articles in this category at most. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, without objection to recreate the category when more fit articles are created. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lightyear characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now, without prejudice against recreation if it can be appropriately populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I believe that WP:RCAT would highly discourage a category comprised primarily of redirects. Just leaving Buzz Lightyear would make this a WP:SMALLCAT. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, without objection to recreate the category when more redirects are converted to articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Luca (2021 film) characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded parent category. Would merge to Category:Luca (2021 film), but that one I nominated for deletion for other reasons. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Luca (2021 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now, without prejudice against recreation if it can be appropriately populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Will likely only ever contain 3 articles. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, without objection to recreate the category when more fit articles are created. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soul (2020 film) characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded parent category. Would merge to Category:Soul (2020 film), but that one I nominated for deletion for other reasons. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soul (2020 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now, without prejudice against recreation if it can be appropriately populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Likely will be a WP:SMALLCAT. Even when all possible articles would be put in, there would only be 4 entries (the film itself, the soundtrack, a short film based on the film, and the accolades list). (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, without objection to recreate the category when more fit articles are created. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Independence Day (United States) foods[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category for a non-defining characteristic. The foods filed here aren't things that are uniquely associated with Independence Day -- it's things like apple pie, baked beans, cheeseburgers, chicken salad, corn on the cob, ice cream, lemonade and pasta salad, that can literally be eaten at absolutely any time of the year whether it's a holiday or not.
Obviously some holidays (e.g. Christmas) have special foods that are uniquely associated with that holiday and not generally eaten at other times of the year, but Independence Day isn't like that: there aren't special "Independence Day" foods per se, and Independence Day parties just feature the same menu as any other summer barbecue or cookout, so the foods here aren't defined by any special association with Independence Day in particular. Bearcat (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2000s establishments in Yugoslavia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#2000s establishments in Yugoslavia

Category:Assassinated heads of government[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Place Clichy's two arguments against a merge give deletion the numbers as well as the strength of arguments. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 06:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, unnecessary overcategorization, the articles of this category are both in assassinated presidents and in assassinated heads of government, but the fact that they were assassinated is unrelated to how government is organized in their country. (Note that I have already added subCategory:Assassinated prime ministers to Category:Assassinated politicians by type.) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Category:Assassinated heads of state and rename it Category:Assassinated heads of state and government (better than deleting it and leaving only heads of state). See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 25#Category:Assassinated heads of government. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 01:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thinker78: The trouble is that this category is currently not in fact about heads of government. It is exclusively filled with leaders like e.g. Park Chung Hee, President of South Korea in 1962-1979, who are executive presidents with direct control of government, as is the case for the President of the United States. There is another category for assassinated actual heads of government, and that is Category:Assassinated prime ministers. Place Clichy (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely because a head of government can include prime ministers, presidents, monarchs I think it should be merged with heads of state. And then with a [Category:Assassinated heads of state and government] we can include monarchs, presidents, prime ministers and others without the confusion that some are heads of government and others heads of state and others both. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well 1°) this would not really make sense only for assassinated people categories; instead we should reflect longstanding parents Category:Heads of state and Category:Heads of government. And 2°) monarchs and presidents are just never really primarily referred to as heads of government; they just also hold roles that are assigned with another figure in other systems. Place Clichy (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional homosexuals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: redundant category layer, both subcategories are also in parent Category:Fictional characters by sexual orientation. Earlier deleted by this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fictional characters by gender[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. The only opposition to the merge was based on a misunderstanding. This status quo is something like: Foo > Foo by gender > Foo males AND foo females. The proposal would turn this into Foo > Foo males AND foo females. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 18:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge redundant category layer because these "by gender" categories only contain male and female. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Category:Fictional characters by franchise and gender and its subcategories as being an intersection of unrelated things. Gender simply has no relation to franchise, these things are entirely disconnected from one another, and some entries are not even franchises, but works by a certain author. This is pure overcategorization. Category:Bond girls is the only one that may be kept as-is, since it has its own main article. Category:Disney Princess characters as well, but this is mostly because "Disney Princess" is in itself a franchise.
Merge Category:Fictional characters by occupation and gender, Category:Fictional males by occupation‎, Category:Fictional females by occupation‎ and everything therein that is simply "fictional male/female ____" as arbitrary categorizations. Keep Category:Fictional characters by gendered occupation and its subcategories as a subcategory of Category:Fictional characters by occupation.
Keep All others as valid as long as gendered categories continue to exist at all. Characters of a certain gender appearing in a certain medium are believably defining. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 08:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Zxcvbnm: possibly you misunderstand the intention of the nomination. The intention is not to abolish male and female subcategories, but rather to eliminate an almost empty parent category layer. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    merge per nom. Mason (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom, useless intermediate layer. WP:OVERLAPCAT applies, as the (usually two) gendered category fit very well into the parent. Place Clichy (talk) 00:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ministers for Ports and Freight[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Ministers for Ports and Freight (Victoria). Pick your favorite speedy. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2B (See Category:Ministers of the Victoria (state) state government) ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. C2E. That was a mistake on my part. Ultraodan (talk) 05:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mesopotamites family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, 1 interlanguage category link (but it only has two people it in) Mason (talk) 03:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kotsiubynsky family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, no interlanguage category link Mason (talk) 03:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bánfi family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, no interlanguage category link Mason (talk) 03:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Himfi family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 17:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, no interlanguage category link Mason (talk) 03:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Losonci family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kontostavlos family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, no interlanguage category link Mason (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Leslie family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: small cat. One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Laroche family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Laroche family

Category:Sahi family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, 1 interlanguage category link, which has the same person in it Mason (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gorchani family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Csillaghy family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Schack von Wittenau family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Herceg family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Kőszegi family. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: one person in family, upmerge to parent family category Mason (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buildings and structures of the Oxe family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Oxe family. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat with only 1 building Mason (talk) 03:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jotana Family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moudarres family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Asfari family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Al-Kihkiha family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Al-Mallah family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Semsey family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in family, no interlanguage category links Mason (talk) 03:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rahmoune family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in family, 1 interlanguage category link (but it also has only 1 person in it) Mason (talk) 03:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Radojević noble family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Radojević noble family

Category:Mirković noble family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Mirković noble family

Category:Nasi family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: two people in family, are a grandfather-grandson pair. no interlanguage links Mason (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Schmeichel family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 2 people in this family category. are a father-son pair Mason (talk) 02:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ungern-Sternberg family residences[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only 1 building in this category Mason (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lehmann Family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in this family category Mason (talk) 02:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sanclemente family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: one person in family Mason (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Psychological drama television and other works[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Psychological drama television and other works

Category:Wolff family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 person in this family Mason (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cure family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 05:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One person in this family Mason (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Allain family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now; this category can be recreated after the articles mentioned by User:Literaturemostly are written. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 17:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small family cat with 2 people (Grandfather son pair) Mason (talk) 02:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The Allain family is also made up of the distinguished painter, engraver and muralist Teófilo Allain, the photographer Teo Allain Chambi, and the photographer Andrés Fernando Allain, who are mentioned in Wikipedia in Spanish and in English. Later the pages of: Teófilo Allain, Teo Allain Chambi and Andrés Fernando Allain will be created. Literaturemostly (talk) 19:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, without prejudice to recreation of the category after these three articles are published. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taxa named by Paul Graham Wilson[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Taxa named by Paul Graham Wilson

Category:Politicians' topics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 11#Category:Politicians' topics

Leave a Reply