The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied as G3 (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wollen-Blohm Prize[edit]

Wollen-Blohm Prize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found absolutely nothing aside from mirrors and the author seemed to have started other articles but I haven't found anything for this. Inviting Calamondin12 and TheGGoose. SwisterTwister talk 01:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No indication that this prize ever existed; could be a hoax. Among other things, the attribution to a "so far unidentified Singaporean patron of the arts" is the kind of vague statement commonly found in hoaxes. The rationale behind a $10,000 cash prize for a philanthropist also seems odd. If this article has any basis in reality at all, it may have been an idea that was proposed but never came to fruition. In any case, if the Wollen-Blohm Prize had ever been actually awarded, we should have heard about it somewhere, since such awards generally attract at least some notice in reliable sources. Calamondin12 (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a likely hoax upon looking up its search results. TheGGoose (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as blatant hoax: have tagged it. --Rubbish computer 22:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.