The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)‎ KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBhasha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Ampercent.com doesn't seem like a reliable source to me. Maybe this Wikipedia-related article should be moved to Wikipedia namespace instead of deleted? Mika1h (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Software. Mika1h (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weakest keep: I found a full article from the Independent. However, that's just one. The article cites a reviewed paper by the authors of the program; I don't think that (or Wikimedia Diff) counts. There are quite a bit of trivial mentions in other papers. Meanwhile, The Hindu and Time of India each devote a paragraph. I feel like there's marginal notability here. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Additionally, there are paragraphs in several books: [1] [2]. There's also this Taylor & Francis encyclopedia that cites it, but I can't find the relevant content that cites it anywhere. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Aaron Liu, the encyclopedia link you pointed lists sites in general and it even includes this wiki (enwiki). Those paragraphs in the books you mentioned are just opinion of other related contents, it even says it is worth to mention WikiBasha a browser extension like ours. That is literally a mention. And this is just a mention of tools capable of doing what WikiBasha does. If I am getting this wrong, please let me know. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 15:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Firstly, you still have the paragraphs in the news, which were what I was mostly referring to when I left the reply below. I'll strike the first book I linked per what you said, thanks, but the other links are still something.
  On the encyclopedia, like I said, that's a {{notelist}}. We'd need to read where the notes are cited to evaluate if the encyclopedia gives it notability. If you did find the part that cites note 34, please paste it here so we can have a look. Aaron Liu (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 20:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I couldn't find more sources than the Independent above published in 2010. Searching for its former name "wikiBabel" brings mostly pages linked to Microsoft that are currently deleted. Its web doesn't really function, etc. ---Tumbuka Arch (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What about the paragraphs above? Aaron Liu (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Aaron Liu I have responded above. Please check. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 15:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.