The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 07:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Conference Junior League[edit]

Welsh Conference Junior League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable regional youth competition - fails WP:GNG. Prod contested with no reason given. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - substansive well sourced article.Fleets (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you even looked at the article? Even if this was a valid reason for keeping, there is virtually no prose, and the only references are external links... J Mo 101 (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - We generally keep articles on leagues, as a sporting competition's governing/organising body is generally notable. There is a lack of prose, but that's for improvement, not deletion. Now, given this is a junior competition, there is the possiblity of merging to South Wales Premiership, the adult league it is apparently affiliated with, if sourcing cannot be found. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping articles on other leagues isn't necessarily a valid reason to do the same here. I can't find a single source referring to this league at all, let alone one that would satisfy the GNG. The Welsh RL website [1] mentions a schools competition, but that doesn't seem to relate to anything in this article. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A google found sources relating to Badminton and Rugby union, but I couldn't find any sources relating to this competition (apart from Wiki mirrors). Mattlore (talk) 06:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While it is true that a league is more likely to satisfy the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia than a team, this league does not. A few Google searches did not turn up and significant, third-party coverage required to establish notability. Malinaccier (talk) 00:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The adult conference league was superseded by a different competition, the junior league was never notable and I presume was superseded by something else - what I don't know - but there are 2 refs in the article neither of which support gng. Szzuk (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Ifnord (talk) 15:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.