The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vinayak Burman[edit]

Vinayak Burman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, lack of in-depth independent coverage. MB 23:38, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete an ad for a lawyer and his firm. Mangoe (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Promotional puff-piece for an individual who doesn't seem to meet general notability guidelines. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC
• Delete. Such coverage as there is seems tangential or promotional. Subject requires substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources to demonstrate notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.