- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, author blanked. ... discospinster talk 22:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Vaachak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a software product that is essentially and advertisement. Wa-a-a-ay too long and detailed, reads like a sales and spec sheet. Almost assuredly copied and pasted from some other source, though I'm not able to find the source online. It's posted by someone connected with the product; the "we" down at the end of the article is a giveaway. General notability of the subject is highly doubtful. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Blanked by original author. On March 12, the text of the article was removed by the original author, with an edit summary reading, "I have decided to withdraw from Wikipedia." Closure requested. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This could be someone's undergraduate project, or perhaps extracts from a technical presentation describing the principles of a particular text-to-speech implementation. It is unsourced original research (there are some generic references, but they are not related to any text in the article). This article links to the established Speech synthesis which is a correctly written article on the topic. 10:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.