The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore "Ted" Jones[edit]

Theodore "Ted" Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Louisiana lobbyist who fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sources used in this article are: 1 & 7) his voter registration records; 2) a search on usa-people-search.com; 3) his bio in the Louisiana Political Hall of Fame, which has a lower threshold of notability than Wikipedia; 4 & 8) original research by the article's since-banned author, which only states that he couldn't actually find the information he was looking for; 5) the website for a consulting firm that his son used to work for; 6) Permanent dead link about the inductees from his year to the LA hall of fame in a local newspaper; 9) an article regarding a minor political scandal that he was partly involved in; 10) a dead link to a wealth management firm. None of these sources are enough to establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Clear lack of strong sources, and the ones that are here do not establish any level of lasting notability. Penale52 (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Came across a few passings mentions but nothing in-depth on subject. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lapablo (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.