The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G4. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soborno Isaac Bari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This just went through AfD, but someone removed the G4 template, so here we go again. Article still doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO. There was some recent addition of stuff after the CSD, but I reverted it due to it being non-neutral and sourced from wholly unreliable sources. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Placed CSD. Just realized it was the page creator who recreated the article and he is now a banned sock. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.