- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rozlyn Papa[edit]
- Rozlyn Papa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Individual was only notable for a one-time scandal on the last season of "The Bachelor". Insufficient sources or notability to maintain a longterm article. Elonka 17:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. There is some press coverage by multiple, major news sources, but appears to be a case of WP:BLP1E. — Satori Son 19:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is nothing here that couldn't be covered in a controversy section on The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love. Note that even the Bachelor for this season, Jake Pavelka, was deemed not-notable enough for a separate article (in a recent AFD). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Elonka 01:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Elonka 01:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love. -- Whpq (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. As nominator, I would support the idea of a merge. The event was definitely notable within the context of this particular season, "The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love". --Elonka 19:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, no merge The redirect to TB:OTWOL is fine, however outside of appearing on The Bachelor, there's nothing about this article that can be merged. The mention of her magazines posed for and agency representation is pretty much violating WP:ADVERT. Nate • (chatter) 01:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - I agree, she's notable only because of The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love, we can't merge, because we would have to add contents for each others. -RobertMel (talk) 04:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Bachelor: On the Wings of Love. What may be worth mentioning about her in Wikipedia seems more appopriate in the narrative of the article about her. If a reality show contestant hasn't appeared in multiple seasons, or appeared on other shows, or been declared the winner, or achieved additional notabilty through her profession, then she seems to fall under the WP:ONEEVENT. It doesn't seem to convey notability for a bio independent of the event article (i.e. the article for that season). And having modeling photos in regional publications (for which there is no cite) doesn't strike me as sufficient to confer notability on a model. --JamesAM (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.