The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Kaufman[edit]

Ron Kaufman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A highly advertorial page for an unremarkable management consultant and author. Does not meet WP:NAUTHOR and significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and other similar sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - I spent quite a while digging around, and his long list of publications appear to be largely self-published, and lack any significant coverage in any other sources. I found one minor reference in a Malaysian newspaper. Mattyjohn (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - WP:NOTLINKEDIN Acnetj (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural Delete per the above, but also, @Sandstein: for future reference, shouldn't an AfD with only a nomination, as a matter of policy, be treated as an expired PROD? ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 15:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.