Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not much discussion unfortunately, but the argument for deletion seems thorough and has some endorsement. RL0919 (talk) 12:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Burge[edit]

Richard Burge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article subject has not received the kind of in-depth coverage that would be necessary to demonstrate independent notability. Provided sources consist of a) one puff-piece "interview" (as in, not a single question asked), b) a number of incidental mentions in connection with a hunting ban proposal (two of which don't even mention his name) - this stuff merely shows that Countryside Alliance deserves an article, and it has one -, c) and two press releases. Further searching pulls up one more company press release, nothing more. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom, available sources do not give any indication that the subject passes GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 19:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle (talk) 22:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply