The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy redirect Unclear why nominator created a stub from a redirect and then AFDed it instead of just re-redirecting it when realizing it already existed. Reywas92^Talk 21:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Río de la Mina (Rio Grande, Puerto Rico)[edit]

Río de la Mina (Rio Grande, Puerto Rico) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is a duplicate of Río de la Mina (Río Grande, Puerto Rico) <-- and this one created a little later is in better shape. Thanks. the eloquent peasant (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And besides the one I marked for deletion article title is missing the diacritical mark on the "Río" of "Río Grande, Puerto Rico" so should be deleted. Again, it's a duplicate of a more correct article.--the eloquent peasant (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - to the correctly titled article. This should have been done in the first place, rather than opening an AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Sorry about that. --the eloquent peasant (talk) 14:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.