The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus for removing the page, no consensus on a merger or redirect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Premier Studios[edit]

Premier Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. References are very poor. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 13:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, there's nothing here - David Gerard (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge: Article should be merged into Nazarene Publishing House. See relevant articles about why a merge makes sense. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete seems like it violates WP:ADV to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- no indications of notability or significance, and insufficient RS. I don't think that a merge / redirect is necessary since the company is thoroughly non notable. The magazine that it published is not notable either. The source offered above is from Biz Journal which ranks rather low in terms of being RS, and mostly providing routine coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.