The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polska (internet celebrity)[edit]

Polska (internet celebrity) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article about an non-notable influencer backed by poor quality sources. lettherebedarklight晚安 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and France. lettherebedarklight晚安 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: My WP:BEFORE was a bit hard since many things are called "Polska", but I was able to scrounge up some results by adding "influenceuse" to the end. However, I could not find any reliable sources with significant coverage. There is some coverage of her after the Quotidien columnist made certain remarks about her and then some about being refused into a restaurant, but these are one-time events that themselves are not encyclopedic at all. Purely clickbaity drama sources can not be the basis of a Wikipedia article. No actual coverage of her or her career was found. Why? I Ask (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep : poor quality sources ???

=> New York Post, CNews, Le Parisien, 20 minutes, BFMTV... and the list goes beyond ... CassiJevenn (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New York Post is currently considered generally unreliable. The other sources are not significant coverage. She was a victim of sexism on a television. Is that worth an entire article? Why? I Ask (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was notified of this AFD as a "significant contributor" to the article, but that's likely because I used RevDel on most of the previous revisions to redact personal information. I think it is possible that sources exist in French that would demonstrate adequate notability, but what's in the article currently appears to fail WP:SIGCOV. Given the borderline notability and the fact that we've already had serious BLP issues, we should err on the side of deleting.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.