The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Payscout Inc.[edit]

Payscout Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporate Spam, Coverage are press release, non-notable. Only for Wikipedia as directory purposes. Light2021 (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as sole advertising and the past accounts focusing with only this account and heavily at it suggests that also, everything listed here is a veiled method of showing us what seems like an article but it is not since everything listed is simply what the company says about itself which goes from the information to sources, nothing here is guaranteed to be non-PR therefore no article (especially if the company was involved here). SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, all sources are press releases or reprints thereof - David Gerard (talk) 13:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.